Sumida Iori, Yamaguchi Hajime, Das Indra J, Anetai Yusuke, Kizaki Hisao, Aboshi Keiko, Tsujii Mari, Yamada Yuji, Tamari Keisuke, Seo Yuji, Isohashi Fumiaki, Yoshioka Yasuo, Ogawa Kazuhiko
Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, NTT West Osaka hospital, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173643. eCollection 2017.
This study evaluated a method for prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on edge-enhanced (EE) intensity in the presence of intrafraction organ deformation using the data of 37 patients treated with step-and-shoot IMRT. On the assumption that the patient setup error was already accounted for by image guidance, only organ deformation over the treatment course was considered. Once the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were delineated and assigned dose constraints for dose optimization, each voxel in the CTV derived from the DICOM RT-dose grid could have a stochastic dose from the different voxel location according to the probability density function as an organ deformation. The stochastic dose for the CTV was calculated as the mean dose at the location through changing the voxel location randomly 1000 times. In the EE approach, the underdose region in the CTV was delineated and optimized with higher dose constraints that resulted in an edge-enhanced intensity beam to the CTV. This was compared to a planning target volume (PTV) margin (PM) approach in which a CTV to PTV margin equivalent to the magnitude of organ deformation was added to obtain an optimized dose distribution. The total monitor units, number of segments, and conformity index were compared between the two approaches, and the dose based on the organ deformation of the CTV, rectum, and bladder was evaluated. The total monitor units, number of segments, and conformity index were significantly lower with the EE approach than with the PM approach, while maintaining the dose coverage to the CTV with organ deformation. The dose to the rectum and bladder were significantly reduced in the EE approach compared with the PM approach. We conclude that the EE approach is superior to the PM with regard to intrafraction organ deformation.
本研究利用37例接受静态调强放射治疗(IMRT)患者的数据,评估了一种基于边缘增强(EE)强度的前列腺调强放射治疗方法,该方法适用于存在分次内器官变形的情况。假设患者摆位误差已通过图像引导得到校正,仅考虑治疗过程中的器官变形。一旦勾勒出临床靶区(CTV)、直肠和膀胱,并为剂量优化分配剂量限制条件,源自DICOM RT剂量网格的CTV中的每个体素根据作为器官变形的概率密度函数,可能从不同体素位置获得随机剂量。通过随机改变体素位置1000次,计算CTV的随机剂量作为该位置的平均剂量。在EE方法中,勾勒出CTV中的低剂量区域,并使用更高的剂量限制条件进行优化,从而形成向CTV的边缘增强强度束。将其与计划靶区(PTV)边缘(PM)方法进行比较,在PM方法中,添加与器官变形幅度相当的CTV到PTV边缘以获得优化的剂量分布。比较了两种方法之间的总监测单位、子野数量和适形指数,并评估了基于CTV、直肠和膀胱器官变形的剂量。EE方法的总监测单位、子野数量和适形指数显著低于PM方法,同时在存在器官变形的情况下保持对CTV的剂量覆盖。与PM方法相比,EE方法中直肠和膀胱所受剂量显著降低。我们得出结论,在分次内器官变形方面,EE方法优于PM方法。