Martin Geoffrey V, Pugh Thomas J, Mahmood Usama, Kudchadker Rajat J, Wang Jihong, Bruno Teresa L, Bathala Tharakeswara, Frank Steven J
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Brachytherapy. 2017 Jul-Aug;16(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Pubic arch interference (PAI), when it occurs, is often a limiting factor for patients pursuing brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer. Pre-brachytherapy pubic arch evaluation is often performed by CT or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), but MRI has increasingly replaced these modalities for prostate cancer evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine if staging MRI could be used to evaluate PAI and compare it with these other imaging methods.
Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing brachytherapy evaluation had pelvic MRI-, CT-, and TRUS-based brachytherapy simulation. Pubic arch overlap on T2-weighted MRI and CT was determined by contouring the prostate gland on its largest axial slice and superimposing this contour onto the pubic arch bones. The largest degree of overlap of the prostate gland on MRI and CT was used to predict the existence of PAI as determined by TRUS-based simulation. The correlation between prostate contour overlap was also compared between MRI and CT.
Nineteen patients (48%) exhibited PAI on TRUS brachytherapy simulation evaluation. The average (±standard error) amount of prostate contour overlap on the pubic arch on CT was 2.9 ± 0.6 mm and on MRI was 2.0 ± 0.6 mm (linear correlation, R, of 0.783, p < 0.001). CT and MRI were equally predictive of PAI on TRUS evaluation (area under the curve = 0.75).
Pre-brachytherapy pubic arch assessment with diagnostic MRI provides similar predictability of PAI compared with CT, potentially obviating the need for additional pre-brachytherapy CT in the setting of staging MRI.
耻骨弓干扰(PAI)一旦出现,往往是前列腺癌患者接受近距离放射治疗的限制因素。近距离放射治疗前的耻骨弓评估通常通过CT或经直肠超声(TRUS)进行,但MRI已越来越多地取代这些方式用于前列腺癌评估。本研究的目的是确定分期MRI是否可用于评估PAI,并将其与其他成像方法进行比较。
41例连续接受近距离放射治疗评估的患者进行了基于盆腔MRI、CT和TRUS的近距离放射治疗模拟。在T2加权MRI和CT上,通过在前列腺最大轴位切片上勾勒前列腺轮廓并将该轮廓叠加到耻骨弓骨上,来确定耻骨弓重叠情况。MRI和CT上前列腺的最大重叠程度用于预测基于TRUS模拟确定的PAI的存在。还比较了MRI和CT之间前列腺轮廓重叠的相关性。
19例患者(48%)在TRUS近距离放射治疗模拟评估中表现出PAI。CT上前列腺轮廓在耻骨弓上的平均(±标准误差)重叠量为2.9±0.6mm,MRI上为2.0±0.6mm(线性相关性,R为0.783,p<0.001)。在TRUS评估中,CT和MRI对PAI的预测能力相同(曲线下面积=0.75)。
与CT相比,诊断性MRI进行近距离放射治疗前的耻骨弓评估对PAI具有相似的预测能力,在分期MRI的情况下可能无需额外进行近距离放射治疗前CT检查。