Alozie Anthony, Paranskaya Liliya, Westphal Bernd, Kaminski Alexander, Steinhoff Gustav, Sherif Mohammad, Ince Hüseyin, Öner Alper
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Rostock, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Rostock, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Dec;26(12):1330-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
Surgical mitral valve repair is the gold standard for treatment of mitral regurgitation. Recently, the transcatheter treatment of mitral regurgitation with the MitraClip device (Abbot Vascular Structural Heart, Menlo Park, CA) has demonstrated promising results in treating patients not amenable for surgical correction of mitral valve regurgitation. Most patients reported in the literature requiring surgical bailout after MitraClip treatment presented with residual or recurrent mitral valve regurgitation. Mitral valve stenosis after MitraClip treatment has been rarely reported.
From February 2010 to December 2014, four patients out of 165 patients who underwent MitraClip therapy developed symptomatic mitral valve stenosis (2.4%) and needed surgical correction. Data of the four patients were reviewed retrospectively. Follow-up data were obtained from each patient's general practitioner/cardiologist by phone calls and facsimile and were complete in all patients.
All four patients were treated with ≥ 2 MitraClip (MC) devices during their initial presentation. All four patients underwent MV replacement with a tissue valve. The postoperative course was uneventful and there was no 30-day mortality. At 6-month follow-up, all patients were alive and in NYHA class I-III.
Placement of multiple clip devices may lead to slightly elevated transmitral gradients. This may not necessarily interpret into symptomatic mitral stenosis. However, in some cases this is possible. Caution should be exercised at this phase of the learning curve of the percutaneous MC treatment, especially in use of multiple MC devices.
外科二尖瓣修复术是治疗二尖瓣反流的金标准。近来,使用MitraClip装置(雅培血管结构心脏公司,加利福尼亚州门洛帕克)经导管治疗二尖瓣反流已在治疗不宜接受二尖瓣反流外科矫正的患者中显示出有前景的结果。文献报道的大多数接受MitraClip治疗后需要外科补救的患者存在残余或复发性二尖瓣反流。MitraClip治疗后二尖瓣狭窄鲜有报道。
2010年2月至2014年12月,165例行MitraClip治疗的患者中有4例(2.4%)出现有症状的二尖瓣狭窄并需要外科矫正。对这4例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。通过电话和传真从每位患者的全科医生/心脏病专家处获取随访数据,所有患者的数据均完整。
所有4例患者在初次就诊时均接受了≥2个MitraClip(MC)装置治疗。所有4例患者均接受了组织瓣膜二尖瓣置换术。术后过程平稳,无30天死亡率。在6个月随访时,所有患者均存活,纽约心脏协会心功能分级为I-III级。
放置多个夹子装置可能导致二尖瓣跨瓣压差略有升高。这不一定会演变为有症状的二尖瓣狭窄。然而,在某些情况下是可能的。在经皮MC治疗的这个学习曲线阶段应谨慎操作,尤其是在使用多个MC装置时。