Suppr超能文献

从呼吸道标本中分离出的鸟分枝杆菌复合群菌种的分布及临床意义

Distribution and clinical significance of Mycobacterium avium complex species isolated from respiratory specimens.

作者信息

Kim Su-Young, Shin Sun Hye, Moon Seong Mi, Yang Bumhee, Kim Hojoong, Kwon O Jung, Huh Hee Jae, Ki Chang-Seok, Lee Nam Yong, Shin Sung Jae, Koh Won-Jung

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;88(2):125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was originally composed of 2 species, M. avium and M. intracellulare. However, several new species closely related to M. intracellulare have recently been identified. In addition, M. avium has been further subdivided into 4 subspecies. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of different MAC species recovered from respiratory specimens and to elucidate the clinical relevance of these species. Clinical isolates, from 219 patients, that had been initially identified as M. avium or M. intracellulare by non-sequencing methods were reidentified using multilocus sequence typing, and the clinical significance of the identified species was then investigated. Of 91 isolates originally identified as M. intracellulare, 75 (82%) were confirmed to be M. intracellulare, 8 (9%) isolates were identified as M. chimaera, and 4 (4%) isolates each were identified as "M. indicus pranii" and M. yongonense. The 128 isolates originally designated as M. avium were determined to be M. avium subsp. hominissuis. Of the 219 patients, 146 (67%) met the diagnostic criteria for MAC lung disease, and for each MAC species, the proportion of patients meeting these criteria was as follows: M. intracellulare (54/75, 72%), M. chimaera (3/8, 38%), "M. indicus pranii" (3/4, 75%), M. yongonense (2/4, 50%), and M. avium subsp. hominissuis (84/128, 66%). In summary, multilocus sequence typing of respiratory isolates initially identified as MAC revealed that, although most isolates were M. avium subsp. hominissuis or M. intracellulare, approximately 7% were newer MAC members, with clinical evidence supporting their potential pathogenicity for humans.

摘要

鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)最初由鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌2个菌种组成。然而,最近已鉴定出几种与胞内分枝杆菌密切相关的新菌种。此外,鸟分枝杆菌已进一步细分为4个亚种。本研究的目的是确定从呼吸道标本中分离出的不同MAC菌种的比例,并阐明这些菌种的临床相关性。对219例最初通过非测序方法鉴定为鸟分枝杆菌或胞内分枝杆菌的临床分离株,采用多位点序列分型进行重新鉴定,然后研究鉴定出的菌种的临床意义。在最初鉴定为胞内分枝杆菌的91株分离株中,75株(82%)被确认为胞内分枝杆菌,8株(9%)分离株被鉴定为chimaera分枝杆菌,4株(4%)分离株分别被鉴定为“印度普拉尼分枝杆菌”和永贡分枝杆菌。最初指定为鸟分枝杆菌的128株分离株被确定为鸟分枝杆菌人亚种。在219例患者中,146例(67%)符合MAC肺病的诊断标准,每种MAC菌种符合这些标准的患者比例如下:胞内分枝杆菌(54/75,72%)、chimaera分枝杆菌(3/8,38%)、“印度普拉尼分枝杆菌”(3/4,75%)、永贡分枝杆菌(2/4,50%)和鸟分枝杆菌人亚种(84/128,66%)。总之,对最初鉴定为MAC的呼吸道分离株进行多位点序列分型显示,虽然大多数分离株是鸟分枝杆菌人亚种或胞内分枝杆菌,但约7%是新的MAC成员,有临床证据支持它们对人类的潜在致病性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验