Chien Chi-Wen, Rodger Sylvia, Copley Jodie, Brown Ted
a Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hong Kong (SAR) , China.
b Occupational Therapy Division , School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jun;40(13):1553-1560. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1300343. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
To investigate the relationship between the Children Participation Questionnaire and the Children's Assessment of Participation with Hands.
Two researchers classified the item contents independently using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Child and Youth version as a guide. Parents of 51 children with intellectual and developmental disabilities completed both measures within one month.
The linking results indicated that the two participation measures covered a broad range of life domains, which corresponded well to the conceptually matched Activities and Participation categories/chapters of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Child and Youth version. A significant moderate link (Spearman's ρ coefficient = 0.68, p < 0.01) between the two measures was found, and all of their matched domains (except for the educational domain) also revealed small to moderate associations (ρ = 0.47-0.71, p < 0.01). The paired items that asked identical or similar life situations between the two measures demonstrated varying correlation levels.
This study provides evidence for the content and construct validity of the two children's participation measures. The findings also offer important insights about the similarities and differences between the two measures. This knowledge will assist clinicians in selecting outcome measures. Implications for rehabilitation The Children Participation Questionnaire and Children's Assessment of Participation with Hands demonstrate good content and convergent validity. The two measures capture distinctive aspects and/or degrees of children's participation. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the similarities and differences between the two measures before selecting outcome measure.
探讨儿童参与问卷与儿童手部参与评估之间的关系。
两名研究人员以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年版》为指导，独立对项目内容进行分类。51名智力和发育障碍儿童的家长在一个月内完成了这两项测评。
关联结果表明，这两项参与测评涵盖了广泛的生活领域，与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年版》中概念匹配的活动和参与类别/章节相符。发现这两项测评之间存在显著的中度关联（斯皮尔曼ρ系数=0.68，p<0.01），并且它们所有匹配的领域（教育领域除外）也显示出小到中度的关联（ρ=0.47-0.71，p<0.01）。两项测评中询问相同或相似生活情境的配对项目显示出不同的相关水平。
本研究为这两项儿童参与测评的内容效度和结构效度提供了证据。研究结果还为这两项测评之间的异同提供了重要见解。这些知识将有助于临床医生选择结局测评工具。康复意义 儿童参与问卷和儿童手部参与评估显示出良好的内容效度和收敛效度。这两项测评捕捉了儿童参与的不同方面和/或程度。临床医生和研究人员在选择结局测评工具之前需要了解这两项测评之间的异同。
