Hatgis Jesse, Granville Michelle, Jacobson Robert E, Berti Aldo
Larkin Hospital, Nova Southeastern University School of Osteopathic Medicine.
Miami Neurosurgical Center, University of Miami Hospital.
Cureus. 2017 Feb 2;9(2):e1008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1008.
In reviewing a larger group of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), we found that the overall incidence of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) is higher than commonly reported values. This is especially seen in patients with previous or concurrent lumbar VCFs and also in a subgroup that had lumbar stenosis or hip arthroplasty. The altered biomechanics due to associated lumbar stenosis or hip arthroplasty lead to increased mechanical stress on already weakened and deficient sacral alae, which are more vulnerable to osteoporotic weakening than other parts of the sacrum.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We studied an overall population of patients with VCF seen clinically and separated the patients into the following groups: patients not previously treated, patients treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty at one or more levels, and patients diagnosed with sacral fractures and treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. We wanted to see if a pattern existed among the patients who had sacral symptoms, were diagnosed with sacral insufficiency fractures, and subsequently underwent sacroplasty.
In a review of 79 consecutive patients, over a 24-month period, with VCF who underwent surgical treatment, there were 10 patients who also had sacral insufficiency fractures. Four of the patients had sacral insufficiency fractures without VCF. None of the patients with sacral insufficiency fractures were on treatment for osteoporosis at the time of diagnosis. The following symptoms indicated SIF: lower sacral pain (n = 10), buttock pain (n = 7), lateral hip pain (n = 5), and groin pain radiating to the thigh (n = 4). The average time to diagnose SIF was two months after the onset of pain.
Sacral insufficiency fractures are a frequent cause of both acute and chronic pain; however, they are often missed by the majority of physicians. The frequency of undetected sacral fractures is high. This is due to a number of potential pitfalls, which include both subjective and objective reasons: the patient presenting with vague symptoms, the physician only performing a physical examination of the lumbar spine, and the physician ordering the inadequate standard lumbosacral radiographs, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as automatically relating the pain and other symptoms to preexisting MRI findings that are very commonly found in the elderly population. All of these pitfalls lead to SIFs being overlooked.
在回顾一大组骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(VCF)时,我们发现骶骨不全骨折(SIF)的总体发生率高于通常报道的值。这在既往有或同时存在腰椎VCF的患者中尤为明显,在患有腰椎管狭窄症或髋关节置换术的亚组患者中也是如此。由于相关的腰椎管狭窄症或髋关节置换术导致的生物力学改变,会使本已脆弱和缺乏的骶骨翼承受更大的机械应力,骶骨翼比骶骨的其他部位更容易受到骨质疏松的影响。
我们研究了临床上所见的VCF患者总体人群,并将患者分为以下几组:未接受过治疗的患者、在一个或多个节段接受过椎体成形术或后凸成形术治疗的患者,以及被诊断为骶骨骨折并接受过椎体成形术或后凸成形术治疗的患者。我们想看看在有骶骨症状、被诊断为骶骨不全骨折并随后接受骶骨成形术的患者中是否存在某种模式。
在回顾连续79例在24个月期间接受手术治疗的VCF患者时,有10例患者同时患有骶骨不全骨折。其中4例患者有骶骨不全骨折但无VCF。所有骶骨不全骨折患者在诊断时均未接受骨质疏松治疗。以下症状提示SIF:骶骨下部疼痛(n = 10)、臀部疼痛(n = 7)、髋关节外侧疼痛(n = 5)以及放射至大腿的腹股沟疼痛(n = 4)。诊断SIF的平均时间为疼痛发作后两个月。
骶骨不全骨折是急性和慢性疼痛的常见原因;然而,大多数医生常常会漏诊。未被发现的骶骨骨折发生率很高。这是由于一些潜在的陷阱,包括主观和客观原因:患者症状模糊,医生仅对腰椎进行体格检查,医生开具的腰骶部X线片、计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)标准不充分,以及将疼痛和其他症状自动与老年人群中非常常见的现有MRI表现相关联。所有这些陷阱都会导致SIF被忽视。