Coppersmith Daniel D L, Nada-Raja Shyamala, Beautrais Annette L
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Email.
School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. Email.
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):356-360. doi: 10.1071/AH16189.
Objective Suicide is a significant public health problem in New Zealand, with the youth suicide rate being one of the highest among developed countries. Increased suicide rates in recent years suggest that the evidence base and research priorities for New Zealand suicide prevention need to be reassessed. To inform policy development, the aim of the present study was to evaluate all peer-reviewed New Zealand published suicide research and major grant allocations from 2006 to 2016. Methods The methodology duplicated a recent Australian review of suicide prevention research and funding. Publications and grant funding allocations were assessed independently. Key research databases were searched in April 2016 for all suicide-related publications. Identified papers were then classified by research type, population focus and type of self-injurious behaviour. Citation indices were obtained for each publication. Annual reports, newsletters and summary data from four major New Zealand funding bodies (the Health Research Council of New Zealand, Marsden Fund, Lottery Health Research and the Ministry of Health) were reviewed for funding allocations. Identified grants were coded for type of project, type of self-injurious behaviour and target population. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results In all, 104 published articles and 27 grants met review criteria. Total funding was NZ$12677261.62. Most published articles were epidemiological in nature and the most common type of grant was for an intervention. Conclusions In the past decade, a substantial number of articles has been published and significant funding was invested in New Zealand's suicide research. The present review suggests that future research investments should focus on effective translation of research findings into suicide prevention programs. Several pragmatic recommendations are proposed to help improve the evidence base and reduce New Zealand's suicide rates. What is known about the topic? Suicide prevention continues to be a national public health priority for New Zealand. Although much is known about the prevalence of suicidal behaviours in New Zealand, less is known about how well suicide research has addressed prevention priorities and specific target populations. Australian research found that research funding and publications were dominated by epidemiological studies rather than evaluation or intervention studies. It is yet to be determined whether these research and funding trends also apply for New Zealand. What does this paper add? This study examined all peer-reviewed and published suicide research and all major suicide prevention projects that have been funded in New Zealand between 2006 and 2016. The purpose of the review was to summarise the evidence base, evaluate funding and determine the ability of the evidence base to inform policy development. The findings demonstrate that the New Zealand research trends are similar to those found in Australia, with most studies being epidemiological and few representative of interventions. What are the implications for practitioners? This review highlights that there were few intervention and evaluation studies. Partnerships between practitioners and/or community organisations implementing interventions and researchers to systematically evaluate existing interventions and develop new evidence-based interventions would help improve the evidence base for New Zealand suicide prevention.
目标 自杀是新西兰一个重大的公共卫生问题,其青少年自杀率在发达国家中位居前列。近年来自杀率上升表明,新西兰预防自杀的证据基础和研究重点需要重新评估。为了为政策制定提供信息,本研究旨在评估2006年至2016年新西兰所有经同行评审发表的自杀研究以及主要拨款分配情况。方法 该方法重复了澳大利亚最近一项关于自杀预防研究和资金的综述。对出版物和拨款资金分配进行独立评估。2016年4月在主要研究数据库中搜索所有与自杀相关的出版物。然后根据研究类型、人群重点和自我伤害行为类型对识别出的论文进行分类。获取每篇出版物的引用指数。审查了新西兰四个主要资助机构(新西兰卫生研究委员会、马斯登基金、彩票健康研究和卫生部)的年度报告、时事通讯和汇总数据,以了解资金分配情况。对识别出的拨款项目按照项目类型、自我伤害行为类型和目标人群进行编码。进行描述性分析。结果 总共104篇已发表文章和27项拨款符合评审标准。总资金为12677261.62新西兰元。大多数已发表文章本质上是流行病学研究,最常见的拨款类型是用于干预。结论 在过去十年中,新西兰发表了大量文章,并在自杀研究方面投入了大量资金。本次综述表明,未来的研究投资应侧重于将研究结果有效转化为自杀预防项目。提出了一些实用建议,以帮助改善证据基础并降低新西兰的自杀率。关于该主题已知的情况是什么?预防自杀仍然是新西兰国家公共卫生的优先事项。虽然对新西兰自杀行为的患病率了解很多,但对于自杀研究在多大程度上解决了预防重点和特定目标人群的问题了解较少。澳大利亚的研究发现,研究资金和出版物主要由流行病学研究主导,而非评估或干预研究。这些研究和资金趋势是否也适用于新西兰还有待确定。本文补充了什么?本研究审查了2006年至2016年期间新西兰所有经同行评审发表的自杀研究以及所有获得资助的主要自杀预防项目。综述的目的是总结证据基础、评估资金并确定证据基础为政策制定提供信息的能力。研究结果表明,新西兰的研究趋势与澳大利亚的相似,大多数研究是流行病学研究,很少有干预研究的代表。对从业者有何影响?本次综述强调干预和评估研究很少。实施干预的从业者和/或社区组织与研究人员之间建立伙伴关系,以系统评估现有干预措施并开发新的循证干预措施,将有助于改善新西兰预防自杀的证据基础。