Floral size and shape evolution following the transition to gender dimorphism.

PREMISE OF THE STUDY

Floral morphology is expected to evolve following the transition from cosexuality to gender dimorphism in plants, as selection through male and female function becomes dissociated. Specifically, male-biased dimorphism in flower size can arise through selection for larger flowers through male function, selection for smaller flowers through female function, or both. The evolutionary pathway to floral dimorphism can be most effectively reconstructed in species with intraspecific variation in sexual system. We examined the evolution of flower size and shape in , whose populations are either gender dimorphic with male and female plants, or cosexual with hermaphroditic plants.

METHODS

Floral morphology was characterized in populations spanning the species' complete range. For a subset of the range where cosexual and dimorphic populations are in close proximity, we compared the size and shape of flowers from female and male plants in dimorphic populations to hermaphrodites in cosexual populations, accounting for variation associated with abiotic environmental conditions.

KEY RESULTS

The magnitude of flower size dimorphism varied across dimorphic populations. After controlling for environmental variation across cosexual and dimorphic populations, flowers on males were larger than flowers on females and hermaphrodites, whereas flower size did not differ between females and hermaphrodites. Flower shape differences were associated with mating type, sexual system, and environmental variation.

CONCLUSIONS

While abiotic environmental gradients shape both overall flower size and shape, male-biased flower size dimorphism in appears to arise through selection for larger flowers in males but not smaller flowers in females.