Craner Julia R, Sperry Jeannie A, Koball Afton M, Morrison Eleshia J, Gilliam Wesley P
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Spectrum Health System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Int J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;24(4):542-551. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9646-3.
Pain catastrophizing and acceptance represent distinct but interrelated constructs that influence adaptation to chronic pain. Clinical and laboratory research suggest that higher levels of catastrophizing and lower levels of acceptance predict worse functioning; however, findings have been mixed regarding which specific outcomes are associated with each construct. The current study evaluates these constructs in relation to pain, affect, and functioning in a treatment-seeking clinical sample.
Participants included 249 adult patients who were admitted to an interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program and completed measures of pain and related psychological and physical functioning.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that pain catastrophizing and acceptance both significantly, but differentially, predicted depressive symptoms and pain-related negative affect. Only pain catastrophizing was a unique predictor of perceived pain severity, whereas acceptance uniquely predicted pain interference and performance in everyday living activities. There were no significant interactions between acceptance and catastrophizing, suggesting no moderation effects.
Findings from the current study indicate a pattern of results similar to prior studies in which greater levels of catastrophic thinking is associated with higher perceived pain intensity whereas greater levels of acceptance relate to better functioning in activities despite chronic pain. However, in the current study, both acceptance and catastrophizing were associated with negative affect. These relationships were significant beyond the effects of clinical and demographic variables. These results support the role of pain acceptance as an important contribution to chronic pain-related outcomes alongside the well-established role of pain catastrophizing. Results are limited by reliance on self-report data, cross-sectional design, and low racial/ethnic diversity.
疼痛灾难化和接纳是不同但相互关联的概念,它们影响着对慢性疼痛的适应。临床和实验室研究表明,更高水平的灾难化和更低水平的接纳预示着功能更差;然而,关于每种概念与哪些特定结果相关的研究结果并不一致。本研究在一个寻求治疗的临床样本中评估这些概念与疼痛、情绪和功能的关系。
参与者包括249名成年患者,他们被纳入一个跨学科慢性疼痛康复项目,并完成了疼痛及相关心理和身体功能的测量。
分层多元回归分析表明,疼痛灾难化和接纳都显著但有差异地预测了抑郁症状和与疼痛相关的负面情绪。只有疼痛灾难化是感知疼痛严重程度的唯一预测因素,而接纳则唯一地预测了疼痛干扰和日常生活活动表现。接纳和灾难化之间没有显著的交互作用,表明没有调节效应。
本研究结果表明了一种与先前研究相似的结果模式,即更高水平的灾难性思维与更高的感知疼痛强度相关,而更高水平的接纳与尽管存在慢性疼痛但在活动中功能更好相关。然而,在本研究中,接纳和灾难化都与负面情绪相关。这些关系在临床和人口统计学变量的影响之外是显著的。这些结果支持了疼痛接纳作为对慢性疼痛相关结果的重要贡献的作用,以及疼痛灾难化已确立的作用。结果受到依赖自我报告数据、横断面设计以及低种族/民族多样性的限制。