Hoeting Natalie M, McCracken Courtney E, McConnell Michael, Sallee Denver, Iannucci Glen J, Oster Matthew E
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Congenit Heart Dis. 2017 Jul;12(4):417-420. doi: 10.1111/chd.12460. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with potential lifetime complications, but auscultation of a BAV click is commonly missed or mistaken for a benign split first heart sound. Our objective was to determine whether pediatric cardiologists could reliably distinguish between BAV clicks and benign split first heart sounds.
Quality evaluation project using de-identified recordings from an outpatient pediatric cardiology clinic.
Twenty-one cardiologists listened to five de-identified recordings of pediatric heart sounds (three with BAV clicks, two with mitral components of benign split first heart sounds) and indicated whether they believed each recording was a BAV or split first heart sound. The accuracy of diagnoses was determined using percent agreement and calculated kappa coefficients for the cohort and subgroups based on those with less than 10 years of experience versus those with ≥10 years. To assess precision, a kappa extension was used for multiple raters to assess interrater agreement.
Among participants, diagnostic accuracy of BAV click was 38%, while accuracy of split first heart sound was 41%. No participant correctly diagnosed all sounds. No difference in agreement was observed when stratifying by experience. Kappa was -0.11 (CI 95% -0.31 to 0.08) for all raters, -0.03 (CI 95% -0.39 to 0.33) for those with less than 10 years' experience, and -0.15 (CI 95% -0.38 to 0.08) for those with ≥10 years' experience. The kappa statistic among the 21 raters was 0.01 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.04), indicating poor precision among the raters.
In this sample of pediatric cardiologists, the diagnostic accuracy of BAV clicks versus split first heart sounds was worse than chance. There was no association between years of experience and diagnostic accuracy. While further study is needed, these data suggest that an echocardiogram may be valuable when either a systolic ejection click or split first heart sound is heard.
二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)疾病与潜在的终身并发症相关,但BAV喀喇音的听诊常被遗漏或误认为是良性的第一心音分裂。我们的目的是确定儿科心脏病专家能否可靠地区分BAV喀喇音和良性第一心音分裂。
使用来自儿科心脏病门诊的去识别记录进行质量评估项目。
21位心脏病专家听取了5份去识别的儿科心音记录(3份有BAV喀喇音,2份有良性第一心音分裂的二尖瓣成分),并指出他们认为每份记录是BAV还是第一心音分裂。根据经验少于10年与经验≥10年的情况,使用一致性百分比和计算队列及亚组的kappa系数来确定诊断的准确性。为评估精确性,使用kappa扩展来评估多个评估者之间的评估者间一致性。
在参与者中,BAV喀喇音的诊断准确性为38%,而第一心音分裂的准确性为41%。没有参与者能正确诊断所有声音。按经验分层时,未观察到一致性的差异。所有评估者的kappa值为-0.11(95%可信区间-0.31至0.08),经验少于10年者为-0.03(95%可信区间-0.39至0.33),经验≥10年者为-0.15(95%可信区间-0.38至0.08)。21位评估者之间的kappa统计量为0.01(95%可信区间-0.03至0.04),表明评估者之间的精确性较差。
在这个儿科心脏病专家样本中,BAV喀喇音与第一心音分裂的诊断准确性比随机猜测还差。经验年限与诊断准确性之间没有关联。虽然需要进一步研究,但这些数据表明,当听到收缩期喷射喀喇音或第一心音分裂时,超声心动图可能很有价值。