Suppr超能文献

种子传播后的捕食以及脊椎动物传播植物在地中海灌木丛中的定居

Post-dispersal seed predation and the establishment of vertebrate dispersed plants in Mediterranean scrublands.

作者信息

Hulme Philip E

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK Fax: 0191-374-2417; e-mail:

出版信息

Oecologia. 1997 Jun;111(1):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s004420050212.

Abstract

The post-dispersal fate of seeds and fruit (diaspores) of three vertebrate-dispersed trees, Crataegus monogyna, Prunus mahaleb and Taxus baccata, was studied in the Andalusian highlands, south-eastern Spain. Exclosures were used to quantify separately the impact of vertebrates and invertebrates on seed removal in relation to diaspore density and microhabitat. The three plant species showed marked differences in the percentage of diaspores removed, ranging from only 5% for C. monogyna to 87% for T. baccata. Although chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs) fed on diaspores, rodents (Apodemus sylvaticus) were the main vertebrate removers of seed and fruit. Two species of ant (Cataglyphis velox and Aphaenogaster iberica) were the only invertebrates observed to remove diaspores. However, the impact of ants was strongly seasonal and they only removed P. mahaleb fruit to any significant extent. While removal of seed by rodents was equivalent to predation, ants were responsible for secondary dispersal. However, their role was limited to infrequent, small-scale redistribution of fruit in the vicinity of parent trees. Rodents and ants differed in their use of different microhabitats. Rodents foraged mostly beneath trees and low shrubs and avoided open areas while the reverse was true of ants. Thus, patterns of post-dispersal seed removal will be contigent on the relative abundance and distribution of ants and rodents. Studies which neglect to quantify separately the impacts of these two guilds of seed removers may fail to elucidate the mechanisms underlying patterns of post-dispersal seed removal. The coincidence of both increased seed deposition by the main avian dispersers (Turdus spp.) and increased seed predation with increasing vegetation height suggested that selection pressures other than post-dispersal seed predation shape the spatial pattern of seed dispersal. Rather than providing a means of escaping post-dispersal seed predators, dispersal appears to direct seeds to microhabitats most suitable for seedling survival. Nevertheless, the reliance of most vertebrate-dispersed trees on regeneration by seed and the absence of persistent soil seed banks imply that post-dispersal seed predators may exert a strong influence on the demography of the plants whose seeds they consume. Even where microsites are limited, the coincidence of the most suitable microhabitats for seedling establishment with those where seed predation is highest provide a means by which selective seed predators can influence community composition.

摘要

在西班牙东南部的安达卢西亚高地,对三种由脊椎动物传播种子的树木——山楂(Crataegus monogyna)、马哈利酸樱桃(Prunus mahaleb)和欧洲红豆杉(Taxus baccata)的种子及果实(传播体)在传播后的命运进行了研究。利用围栏分别量化脊椎动物和无脊椎动物对种子移除的影响,这与传播体密度和微生境有关。这三种植物在传播体被移除的百分比上表现出显著差异,山楂只有5%,而欧洲红豆杉高达87%。虽然苍头燕雀(Fringilla coelebs)以传播体为食,但啮齿动物(林姬鼠Apodemus sylvaticus)是种子和果实的主要脊椎动物移除者。两种蚂蚁(敏捷猫蚁Cataglyphis velox和伊比利亚弓背蚁Aphaenogaster iberica)是观察到的仅有的移除传播体的无脊椎动物。然而,蚂蚁的影响具有强烈的季节性,而且它们只在很大程度上移除马哈利酸樱桃的果实。虽然啮齿动物对种子的移除相当于捕食,但蚂蚁负责二次传播。然而,它们的作用仅限于在母树附近对果实进行不频繁的小规模重新分布。啮齿动物和蚂蚁在不同微生境的利用上存在差异。啮齿动物大多在树下和低矮灌木下觅食,避开开阔区域,而蚂蚁则相反。因此,传播后种子移除的模式将取决于蚂蚁和啮齿动物的相对丰度和分布。那些没有分别量化这两类种子移除者影响的研究可能无法阐明传播后种子移除模式背后的机制。主要鸟类传播者(鸫属Turdus spp.)增加种子沉积以及种子捕食随着植被高度增加而增加,这两者的巧合表明,除了传播后种子捕食之外,选择压力塑造了种子传播的空间模式。传播似乎不是为了提供一种逃避传播后种子捕食者的方式,而是将种子引导到最适合幼苗存活的微生境。然而,大多数由脊椎动物传播种子的树木依赖种子进行更新,并且缺乏持久的土壤种子库,这意味着传播后种子捕食者可能对它们所消耗种子的植物种群动态产生强烈影响。即使微生境有限,最适合幼苗建立的微生境与种子捕食最高的微生境的巧合,为选择性种子捕食者影响群落组成提供了一种方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验