Downes B J, Lake P S, Schreiber E S G, Glaister A
Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia, , , , , , AU.
Oecologia. 2000 Jun;123(4):569-581. doi: 10.1007/PL00008862.
Habitat structure has pervasive effects on community composition and diversity, with physically complex habitats often containing more species than physically simple ones. What factors or mechanism drive this pattern is little understood, but a complicating problem is that different sources of habitat structure can be confounded in both surveys and experiments. In this study, we carried out an experiment in which two sources of habitat structure, attached macroalgae and substrate surface texture, were separately manipulated to discern their joint and separate effects upon the diversity and composition of colonizing macroinvertebrates in a stony, upland stream. Because stream algae vary markedly in abundance in both space and time, we also sampled the epilithon of stream stones at two spatial scales on eight dates over 2 years to gain some preliminary data on how stream algae vary between individual substrata over time. Experimental substrata had either a smooth (siltstones, sandstones, crystal-poor felsic volcanics, plain paving bricks) or rough (granodiorites, crystal-rich felsic volcanics, sand-blasted paving bricks) surface. We allowed these substrata to be colonized naturally by macroalgae, mostly the filamentous red alga Audouinella hermannii. Half of each of the rough and smooth substrata were selected at random and the macroalgae gently sheared off. All substrata were defaunated with a household insecticide with little field persistence, set out randomly through the study riffle, and invertebrates allowed to colonize them for 14 days. Some substrata were sampled immediately to check the efficacy of faunal and algal removals, which proved to be successful. Experimental results showed that both surface texture and macroalgae increase species richness independently of each other. Surface texture had no effect on densities, while macroalgae increased colonization densities, but rarefaction showed that both sources of habitat structure increased species richness above values expected simply on the basis of the numbers of colonists. However, reference stones with high macroalgal cover had the same species richness as those with low cover, suggesting that the effects of macroalgae on species richness are transient relative to those associated with surface texture. Epilithon samples taken at different times suggest that the magnitude of spatial variation in plant growth alters with time. If plants generally recolonize rough surfaces more quickly than smooth, then the effects of habitat structure on macroinvertebrates ought to be strongest after major disturbances during growing seasons of plants.
栖息地结构对群落组成和多样性具有广泛影响,物理结构复杂的栖息地通常比物理结构简单的栖息地包含更多物种。对于驱动这种模式的因素或机制,人们了解甚少,但一个复杂的问题是,在调查和实验中,不同的栖息地结构来源可能会相互混淆。在本研究中,我们进行了一项实验,分别操控栖息地结构的两个来源,即附着的大型藻类和基质表面质地,以辨别它们对一条多石的高地溪流中定殖的大型无脊椎动物的多样性和组成的联合影响和单独影响。由于溪流藻类在空间和时间上的丰度差异显著,我们还在两年内的八个日期,在两个空间尺度上对溪流石块的附石生物进行了采样,以获取一些关于溪流藻类如何随时间在各个基质之间变化的初步数据。实验基质的表面要么光滑(粉砂岩、砂岩、贫晶质长英质火山岩、普通铺路砖),要么粗糙(花岗闪长岩、富晶质长英质火山岩、喷砂铺路砖)。我们让这些基质自然地被大型藻类定殖,主要是丝状红藻奥氏藻。从粗糙和光滑基质中各随机选取一半,轻轻剪掉上面的大型藻类。所有基质都用一种在野外残留性很小的家用杀虫剂清除动物,随机放置在研究浅滩中,让无脊椎动物在上面定殖14天。对一些基质立即进行采样,以检查清除动物和藻类的效果,结果证明是成功的。实验结果表明,表面质地和大型藻类都能独立增加物种丰富度。表面质地对密度没有影响,而大型藻类增加了定殖密度,但稀疏分析表明,这两种栖息地结构来源增加的物种丰富度都高于仅基于定殖者数量预期的值。然而,大型藻类覆盖率高的参照石块与覆盖率低的石块具有相同的物种丰富度,这表明相对于与表面质地相关的影响,大型藻类对物种丰富度的影响是短暂的。在不同时间采集的附石生物样本表明,植物生长的空间变化幅度随时间而改变。如果植物通常在粗糙表面上比在光滑表面上重新定殖得更快,那么栖息地结构对大型无脊椎动物的影响在植物生长季节的重大干扰之后应该最为强烈。