Underwood A J
Zoology Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(2):185-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00344847.
Previous investigations have shown that competition for space among sessile organisms in rocky intertidal communities is often reduced by predation or harsh environmental factors. Grazing gastropods are unlikely to compete for space, but at high densities might compete for food, unless some factor, such as predation, reduced the densities. The coexisting species of herbivourous gastropods on rock-platforms in New South Wales are not, however, subject to high levels of predation on shores sheltered from waveaction. In this study, three of these species were caged at densities from the natural, to 4 times the natural density on the shore, in different combinations of species, to investigate their competitive interactions. All three species, Nerita atramentosa, Bembicium nanum and the limpet Cellana tramoserica, showed increased mortality and reduced weight at increased density, over 100- or 200-day periods. The effect of high density on Cellana was greater than on Nerita or on Bembicium. In addition, Nerita was competitively superior to the other two species. Cellana, at high densities, adversely affected Bembicium. Nerita was not affected by high densities of either of the other two species, and Cellana was not affected by Bembicium.Under entirely natural conditions, the effects of increased density of Cellana on the mortality and tissue-weight of Bembicium could not occur, because of the high rate of mortality of Cellana when at increased density of its own species. The other effects of increased density of snails would, however, occur. Thus, there can be regulation of numbers of snails because of high densities of their own or other species on the shore.The supply of benthic, microalgal food is proposed as the limiting resource for which the species compete. Hypotheses are proposed to account for the mechanisms by which the three species acquire different amounts of the resource. These are based on aspects of the feeding biology of the snails.The continued coexistence, in intertidal regions, of Cellana, which shows the highest rate of mortality due to members of its own species, with the competitively dominant Nerita, which increases the mortality of Cellana, is apparently due to three factors. These are: (i) the presence of subtidal refuges for breeding populations of Cellana, (ii) regular spatial dispersion of Cellana which would probably decrease intraspecific competition for food, and (iii) the high variability in space and time of recruitment of planktonic larvae of both Cellana and Nerita. This last factor makes it unlikely that high densities of Nerita could occur on all shores in every year. Cellana could always recolonize any area where its density had previously been reduced, and thus, cannot be excluded by competitive interactions. Competitive interactions at high densities of gastropods can therefore cause reductions in the number of each species present on a shore. They cannot, however, lead to exclusion of any species or alter the composition of the community of herbivores on the shore.The difference between competition for space by sessile intertidal organisms, and competition for food by gastropods which graze on microalgae is discussed with respect to the structure of intertidal communities. In the former case, competitively dominant species must be dislodged from the resource, space, by disturbance (e.g. predation or hazards) before recolonization by inferior competitors can occur. In the latter situation, the food resource is renewable without further perturbation of the community, and the competitively dominant species could never consume it completely over a wide enough area, and for a sufficient length of time, to eliminate totally another species.
先前的研究表明,在岩石潮间带群落中,固着生物之间对空间的竞争常常因捕食或恶劣的环境因素而减弱。植食性腹足类不太可能竞争空间,但在高密度时可能会竞争食物,除非某些因素,如捕食,降低了其密度。然而,新南威尔士州岩石平台上共存的植食性腹足类物种,在免受海浪冲击的海岸上,并未遭受高水平的捕食。在本研究中,将其中三种物种以不同的物种组合,从自然密度到海岸自然密度的4倍进行笼养,以研究它们的竞争相互作用。在100天或200天的时间段内,所有三种物种,即黑纹蜑螺(Nerita atramentosa)、矮小滨螺(Bembicium nanum)和笠贝(Cellana tramoserica),随着密度增加,死亡率上升且体重减轻。高密度对笠贝的影响大于对黑纹蜑螺或矮小滨螺的影响。此外,黑纹蜑螺在竞争中优于其他两个物种。高密度时,笠贝对矮小滨螺产生不利影响。黑纹蜑螺不受其他两个物种高密度的影响,笠贝也不受矮小滨螺的影响。在完全自然的条件下,由于笠贝自身物种密度增加时死亡率很高,所以笠贝密度增加对矮小滨螺死亡率和组织重量的影响不会发生。然而,蜗牛密度增加的其他影响将会出现。因此,由于海岸上自身或其他物种的高密度,蜗牛数量可以得到调节。底栖微藻食物的供应被认为是这些物种竞争的限制资源。提出了一些假设来解释这三个物种获取不同数量资源的机制。这些假设基于蜗牛摄食生物学的各个方面。在潮间带区域,笠贝因自身物种成员导致死亡率最高,而具有竞争优势的黑纹蜑螺会增加笠贝的死亡率,它们能持续共存显然有三个因素。这些因素是:(i)笠贝繁殖群体有潮下避难所;(ii)笠贝有规律的空间分布,这可能会减少种内对食物的竞争;(iii)笠贝和黑纹蜑螺浮游幼虫的补充在空间和时间上高度可变。最后一个因素使得黑纹蜑螺每年在所有海岸都不太可能出现高密度。笠贝总能重新定殖到其密度先前降低的任何区域,因此,不会因竞争相互作用而被排除。因此,腹足类高密度时的竞争相互作用会导致海岸上每个物种的数量减少。然而,它们不会导致任何物种被排除,也不会改变海岸上植食性动物群落的组成。关于潮间带群落的结构,讨论了潮间带固着生物对空间的竞争与以微藻为食的腹足类对食物的竞争之间的差异。在前一种情况下,竞争优势物种必须通过干扰(如捕食或灾害)从资源空间中被移除,劣等竞争者才能重新定殖。在后一种情况下,食物资源是可再生的,无需对群落进行进一步扰动,而且竞争优势物种永远不可能在足够大的区域、足够长的时间内完全消耗食物,从而完全排除另一个物种。