Suppr超能文献

四种热带圆蛛(蜘蛛目:园蛛科)的猎物分析及与温带园蛛的比较。

Prey analysis of four species of tropical orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae) and a comparison with araneids of the temperate zone.

作者信息

Nentwig Wolfgang

机构信息

Fachbereich Biologie, Universität, Lahnberge, D-3550, Marburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1985 Jul;66(4):580-594. doi: 10.1007/BF00379353.

Abstract

The actual prey in the orb webs of four araneid spiders (Nephila clavipes, Eriophora fuliginea, Argiope argentata, and A. savignyi) and the relative abundance of their potential prey (pitfall traps, yellow traps, and sweep-netting) was investigated over 1 year at different locations in Panama. The relative abundance of insects and spiders depends on seasonal fluctuations (Fig. 2) which are reflected by corresponding variations in the effectiveness of the webs. The main prey groups are Nematocera (50%-68%), winged Formicoidea (6%-15%) and Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, and Brachycera (4%-10% each) (Fig. 4-6). The remaining 10%-17% of the prey comes from up to 26 other groups (Table 2). Differences in prey size and prey composition between the spider species are small (Fig. 7). Most prey items are 1-2 mm long: only a few insects exceed 30 mm body length (Figs. 9-12). Relative to the available prey, some groups (e.g. Nematocera, Aphidoidea, Psocoptera) are caught selectively, while other groups (e.g. Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Orthoptera) are underrepresented in the prey spectrum and obviously avoid orb webs (Table 7). The differences in prey composition between araneids of the tropics and of the temperate zone are discussed (Table 8) and compared to those recorded in other studies (Table 9, 10). Most of these report large numbers of big prey items (Odonata, Lepidoptera, wasps/bees). It is pointed out that those studies do not take into account the total available prey in a spider's web but only that part which the spider selects from the web (mainly according to size). The importance of small prey items even for large spiders is explained and an obvious lack of niche partitioning among coexisting araneids is discussed (Table 11).

摘要

在巴拿马的不同地点,对四种园蛛科蜘蛛(棒络新妇蛛、茶色 Eriophora fuliginea、银斑蛛和萨氏银斑蛛)圆网中的实际猎物及其潜在猎物的相对丰度(陷阱诱捕、黄色诱捕和扫网法)进行了为期 1 年的调查。昆虫和蜘蛛的相对丰度取决于季节波动(图 2),这通过蛛网有效性的相应变化反映出来。主要猎物类别为长角亚目(50%-68%)、有翅蚁总科(6%-15%)以及膜翅目、鞘翅目和短角亚目(各占 4%-10%)(图 4-6)。其余 10%-17%的猎物来自多达 26 个其他类别(表 2)。蜘蛛物种之间猎物大小和猎物组成的差异较小(图 7)。大多数猎物体长为 1-2 毫米:只有少数昆虫体长超过 30 毫米(图 9-12)。相对于可得猎物,一些类别(如长角亚目、蚜总科、啮目)被选择性捕获,而其他类别(如半翅目、鞘翅目、短角亚目、直翅目)在猎物谱中占比不足,明显避开圆网(表 7)。讨论了热带和温带园蛛科蜘蛛在猎物组成上的差异(表 8),并与其他研究记录的差异进行了比较(表 9、10)。这些研究大多报告有大量大型猎物(蜻蜓目、鳞翅目、黄蜂/蜜蜂)。指出这些研究没有考虑蜘蛛网上可得的全部猎物,而只考虑了蜘蛛从网上选择的部分(主要根据大小)。解释了即使对大型蜘蛛来说小猎物的重要性,并讨论了共存园蛛科蜘蛛之间明显缺乏生态位划分的情况(表 11)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验