Munger James C
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Oecologia. 1984 Jun;62(3):351-360. doi: 10.1007/BF00384267.
Two aspects of the use of space were studied for two species of horned lizard: (1) Do they restrict their movements to limited areas or do they wander more or less randomly? (2) Is overlap between home ranges reduced below what it would be if home ranges were placed at random with respect to one another?Forty-nine individuals were tagged with radiotransmitters or radioactive tags and their movements compared to a computer-generated random model. It was found that horned lizards typically occupy areas much smaller than they would if they moved randomly, that is, they occupy a limited home range. "Home ranges" calculated from location points generated by computer randomizations share several characteristics with the limited home ranges of lizards not moving randomly. Randomly derived location points can be surrounded by a minimum convex polygon, or characterized by a probability density function or utilization distribution, and lead to a percent-change in area vs. capture number curve very similar to that shown by lizards not moving randomly. Therefore, none of these techniques distringuishes between home ranges that result from nonrandom use of space and those that result from a randomly moving animal. Previous studies have failed to draw the distinction between these two types of home range. This distinction should be recognized, however, because the underlying processes differ so dramatically.Observed home range overlap was compared with overlap that would be expected if home ranges were located at random with respect to one another. In one of the years tested, reduced overlap was detected at a marginally significant level. This pattern becomes stronger if only overlap with conspecifics is considered. This strongly suggests that home range overlap is reduced between horned lizards. Contrary to expectation, overlap between individuals of opposite sex tended to be less than overlap between individuals of the same sex.
针对两种角蜥,研究了其空间利用的两个方面:(1)它们是将活动限制在有限区域内,还是或多或少随机游荡?(2)与彼此随机放置的家域相比,家域之间的重叠是否减少?四十九只个体被标记上无线电发射器或放射性标签,并将它们的活动与计算机生成的随机模型进行比较。研究发现,角蜥通常占据的区域比它们随机移动时要小得多,也就是说,它们占据有限的家域。通过计算机随机生成的位置点计算出的“家域”与不随机移动的蜥蜴的有限家域具有几个共同特征。随机得出的位置点可以被一个最小凸多边形包围,或者由概率密度函数或利用分布来表征,并且会得出一个面积变化百分比与捕获数量的曲线,与不随机移动的蜥蜴所显示的曲线非常相似。因此,这些技术都无法区分因非随机空间利用导致的家域和因随机移动的动物导致的家域。先前的研究未能区分这两种类型的家域。然而,应该认识到这种区别,因为潜在的过程差异极大。将观察到的家域重叠与如果家域彼此随机定位时预期的重叠进行了比较。在测试的其中一年中,检测到重叠减少,且达到了边缘显著水平。如果只考虑与同种个体的重叠,这种模式会更强。这强烈表明角蜥之间的家域重叠减少。与预期相反,异性个体之间的重叠往往小于同性个体之间的重叠。