Suppr超能文献

挪威东南部黑琴鸡和黑嘴松鸡的巢穴损失与小型啮齿动物数量周期的关系

Nest loss in capercaillie and black grouse in relation to the small rodent cycle in southeast Norway.

作者信息

Wegge P, Storaas T

机构信息

Department of Nature Conservation, Agr. Univ. of Norway, Ås-NLH, P.O. Box 39, N-1432, Norway.

Department of Nature Management, Hedmark College, N-2475, Opphus, Norway.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1990 Apr;82(4):527-530. doi: 10.1007/BF00319796.

Abstract

The relationship between nest loss in boreal forest grouse and the fluctuations in small rodents was studied at Varaldskogen in southeast Norway during 1979-1986, covering two complete rodent cycles. Nest loss in capercaillie (N=174) and black grouse (N=81) was calculated according to Mayfield (1975) based on nests from radio-equipped hens (N=77) and nests found by other methods (N=178). Small rodent density was measured by snap trapping during spring and autumn. Losses varied as predicted by the classical alternative prey hypothesis (Hagen 1952 and Lack 1954, as elaborated by Angelstam et al. 1984): high losses during rodent crash years (85.5% capercaillie, 51% black grouse), and smaller losses during peak years (54.5% capercaillie, 32.5% black grouse). Losses were inversely related to autumn abundance of rodents in capercaillie (P<0.05), but the correlation was not significant for black grouse (0.10<P<0.20). In capercaillie, the only species with an adequate sample for analysis, no relationship was detected between spring density of rodents and nest loss. Losses during the prepeak years were nearly as high as during crash years, a result inconsistent with the model. We conclude that the numerical response of predators to their cyclic main prey (i.e. small rodents) probably play a main role during the low phase and prepeak year, whereas the dietary shift is most important during the peak and crash year of the cycle.

摘要

1979年至1986年期间,在挪威东南部的瓦拉尔兹科根研究了北方森林松鸡的巢穴损失与小型啮齿动物数量波动之间的关系,涵盖了两个完整的啮齿动物周期。根据梅菲尔德(1975年)的方法,基于无线电追踪母鸡的巢穴(N = 77)和通过其他方法发现的巢穴(N = 178),计算了黑琴鸡(N = 174)和黑松鸡(N = 81)的巢穴损失。在春季和秋季通过快速诱捕来测量小型啮齿动物的密度。损失情况如经典的替代猎物假说(哈根1952年和拉克1954年,安格尔斯塔姆等人1984年详细阐述)所预测的那样有所变化:在啮齿动物数量暴跌年份损失率较高(黑琴鸡为85.5%,黑松鸡为51%),在数量高峰期损失率较小(黑琴鸡为54.5%,黑松鸡为32.5%)。黑琴鸡的损失与秋季啮齿动物数量呈负相关(P < 0.05),但黑松鸡的相关性不显著(0.10 < P < 0.20)。在黑琴鸡中,这是唯一有足够样本进行分析的物种,未发现春季啮齿动物密度与巢穴损失之间存在关系。数量高峰期前几年的损失率几乎与数量暴跌年份一样高,这一结果与模型不符。我们得出结论,捕食者对其周期性主要猎物(即小型啮齿动物)的数量反应可能在低数量阶段和数量高峰期前几年起主要作用,而饮食转变在周期的高峰期和暴跌年份最为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验