Sousa Andreia S P, Leite João, Costa Bianca, Santos Rubim
Escola Superior de Saúde do Porto, Centro de Estudos de Movimento e Actividade Humana, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal.
J Athl Train. 2017 Apr;52(4):360-367. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.2.08. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Despite extensive research on chronic ankle instability, the findings regarding proprioception have been conflicting and focused only on the injured limb. Also, the different components of proprioception have been evaluated in isolation.
To evaluate bilateral ankle proprioception in individuals with unilateral ankle instability.
Cohort study.
Research laboratory center in a university.
Twenty-four individuals with a history of unilateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability (mechanical ankle instability group, n = 10; functional ankle instability [FAI] group, n = 14) and 20 controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ankle active and passive joint position sense, kinesthesia, and force sense.
We observed a significant interaction between the effects of limb and group for kinesthesia (F = 3.27, P = .049). Increased error values were observed in the injured limb of the FAI group compared with the control group (P = .031, Cohen d = 0.47). Differences were also evident for force sense (F = 9.31, P < .001): the FAI group demonstrated increased error versus the control group (injured limb: P < .001, Cohen d = 1.28; uninjured limb: P = .009, Cohen d = 0.89) and the mechanical ankle instability group (uninjured limb: P = .023, Cohen d = 0.76).
Individuals with unilateral FAI had increased error ipsilaterally (injured limb) for inversion movement detection (kinesthesia) and evertor force sense and increased error contralaterally (uninjured limb) for evertor force sense.
尽管对慢性踝关节不稳进行了广泛研究,但关于本体感觉的研究结果一直存在矛盾,且仅关注受伤肢体。此外,本体感觉的不同组成部分是单独评估的。
评估单侧踝关节不稳患者的双侧踝关节本体感觉。
队列研究。
一所大学的研究实验室中心。
24名有单侧踝关节扭伤和慢性踝关节不稳病史的个体(机械性踝关节不稳组,n = 10;功能性踝关节不稳[FAI]组,n = 14)和20名对照组。
踝关节主动和被动关节位置觉、运动觉和力觉。
我们观察到肢体和组对运动觉的影响之间存在显著交互作用(F = 3.27,P = 0.049)。与对照组相比,FAI组受伤肢体的误差值增加(P = 0.031,Cohen d = 0.47)。力觉方面也存在明显差异(F = 9.31,P < 0.001):FAI组与对照组相比误差增加(受伤肢体:P < 0.001,Cohen d = 1.28;未受伤肢体:P = 0.009,Cohen d = 0.89),与机械性踝关节不稳组相比也有差异(未受伤肢体:P = 0.023,Cohen d = 0.76)。
单侧FAI个体在同侧(受伤肢体)进行内翻运动检测(运动觉)和外翻肌力觉时误差增加,在对侧(未受伤肢体)进行外翻肌力觉时误差增加。