Roy Bhaskar, McCullough Louise D, Dhar Rajat, Grady James, Wang Yu-Bo, Brown Robert J
University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(5-6):266-271. doi: 10.1159/000458536. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
The main reason for morbidity after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The mainstay of medical therapy for treating DCI is induced hypertension with vasopressors to restore cerebral perfusion. Both phenylephrine (PE) and norepinephrine (NE) are commonly used for induced hypertension, but the impact of the initial choice of vasopressor on the efficacy, adverse effects, or outcome after hemodynamic therapy for DCI is unknown.
Sixty-three patients with aSAH between January 2012 and October 2014, who developed DCI (defined as new focal deficit or decline in Glasgow Coma Score) and in which PE (n = 45) or NE (n = 18) treatment was initiated were evaluated in this retrospective study. Baseline characteristics, adverse effects, the need to change or add vasopressors, the response to therapy, the need for endovascular therapy, new infarct development, discharge disposition, and 3 months modified Rankin score were all compared between pressor groups.
Baseline characteristics (e.g., Hunt Hess and Fisher grades) were similar. There were no differences in the overall rate of complications including arrhythmia, pulmonary edema, or kidney injury. However, those initiated on PE were more likely to be changed to an alternate vasopressor (64 vs. 33%, p = 0.016), mostly for bradycardia or failure to reach therapeutic targets. Patients initially treated with PE were less likely to respond neurologically (71 vs. 94%, p = 0.01) or to be discharged to home or acute rehabilitation facilities (73 vs. 94%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to have a delayed infarct on imaging (62 vs. 33%, p = 0.04).
Our study suggests that patients with DCI after aSAH initiated on PE are more likely to require treatment change to another vasopressor and are at greater risk for poor clinical outcomes compared to patients started on NE. Larger comparative studies are warranted.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后发病的主要原因是延迟性脑缺血(DCI)。治疗DCI的主要药物治疗方法是使用血管升压药诱导高血压以恢复脑灌注。去氧肾上腺素(PE)和去甲肾上腺素(NE)都常用于诱导高血压,但血管升压药的初始选择对DCI血流动力学治疗后的疗效、不良反应或结局的影响尚不清楚。
在这项回顾性研究中,评估了2012年1月至2014年10月期间63例发生DCI(定义为新出现的局灶性缺损或格拉斯哥昏迷评分下降)且开始使用PE(n = 45)或NE(n = 18)治疗的aSAH患者。比较了升压药组之间的基线特征、不良反应、更换或添加血管升压药的必要性、对治疗的反应、血管内治疗的必要性、新梗死灶的发生、出院情况以及3个月改良Rankin评分。
基线特征(如Hunt Hess和Fisher分级)相似。包括心律失常、肺水肿或肾损伤在内的总体并发症发生率没有差异。然而,开始使用PE的患者更有可能更换为另一种血管升压药(64%对33%,p = 0.016),主要原因是心动过缓或未达到治疗目标。最初接受PE治疗的患者神经功能恢复的可能性较小(71%对94%,p = 0.01),出院回家或急性康复机构的可能性较小(73%对94%,p = 0.02),影像学上出现延迟梗死的可能性较大(62%对33%,p = 0.04)。
我们的研究表明,与开始使用NE的患者相比,aSAH后发生DCI且开始使用PE的患者更有可能需要更换为另一种血管升压药治疗,并且临床预后不良的风险更高。需要进行更大规模的比较研究。