Suppr超能文献

使用全球触发工具探究挪威和瑞典医院不良事件发生率的异同。

Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool.

作者信息

Deilkås Ellen Tveter, Risberg Madeleine Borgstedt, Haugen Marion, Lindstrøm Jonas Christoffer, Nylén Urban, Rutberg Hans, Michael Soop

机构信息

National Patient Safety Program, Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.

Health Services Research Center, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e012492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT).

DESIGN

All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway. Records were randomly selected from all eligible admissions in 2013. Eligible admissions were patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing care with an in-hospital stay of at least 24 hours, excluding psychiatric and care and rehabilitation. Reviews were done according to GTT methodology.

SETTING

Similar contexts for healthcare and similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics have inspired the Nordic countries to exchange experiences from measuring and monitoring quality and patient safety in healthcare. The co-operation has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national and local rates of AEs in hospital care.

PARTICIPANTS

10 986 medical records were reviewed in Norway and 19 141 medical records in Sweden.

RESULTS

No significant difference between overall AE rates was found between the two countries. The rate was 13.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) in Norway and 14.4% (95% CI 12.6% to 16.3%) in Sweden. There were significantly higher AE rates of surgical complications in Norwegian hospitals compared with Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and 'other' AEs. Among more severe AEs, Norwegian hospitals had significantly higher rates of surgical complications than Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of postpartum AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of patient safety in acute care hospitals, as assessed by GTT, was essentially the same in both countries. The differences between the countries in the rates of several types of AEs provide new incentives for Norwegian and Swedish governing bodies to address patient safety issues.

摘要

目的

在本文中,我们通过使用全球触发工具(GTT)审查病历,探究挪威和瑞典医院不良事件(AE)发生率的异同。

设计

两国所有急性护理医院均进行了病历审查,但挪威有一家医院除外。病历从2013年所有符合条件的入院病例中随机抽取。符合条件的入院患者为18岁及以上、住院时间至少24小时、不包括精神科以及护理与康复患者。审查按照GTT方法进行。

背景

相似的医疗保健环境以及相似的社会经济和人口特征促使北欧国家交流医疗保健质量测量与监测以及患者安全方面的经验。这种合作推动了使用GTT来监测医院护理中全国和地方的不良事件发生率。

参与者

挪威审查了10986份病历,瑞典审查了19141份病历。

结果

两国总体不良事件发生率未发现显著差异。挪威的发生率为13.0%(95%可信区间为11.7%至14.3%),瑞典为14.4%(95%可信区间为12.6%至16.3%)。与瑞典医院相比,挪威医院手术并发症的不良事件发生率显著更高。瑞典医院压疮、跌倒及“其他”不良事件的发生率显著更高。在更严重的不良事件中,挪威医院手术并发症的发生率显著高于瑞典医院。瑞典医院产后不良事件的发生率显著更高。

结论

通过GTT评估,两国急性护理医院的患者安全水平基本相同。两国在几种不良事件发生率上的差异为挪威和瑞典管理机构解决患者安全问题提供了新的动力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验