Seldal Tarald, Hegland Stein Joar, Rydgren Knut, Rodriguez-Saona Cesar, Töpper Joachim Paul
Faculty of Engineering and Science Sogn & Fjordane University College Sogndal Norway.
Department of Entomology Rutgers University Chatsworth NJ USA.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 15;7(6):1762-1769. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2687. eCollection 2017 Mar.
Inducible plant defense is a beneficial strategy for plants, which imply that plants should allocate resources from growth and reproduction to defense when herbivores attack. Plant ecologist has often studied defense responses in wild populations by biomass clipping experiments, whereas laboratory and greenhouse experiments in addition apply chemical elicitors to induce defense responses. To investigate whether field ecologists could benefit from methods used in laboratory and greenhouse studies, we established a randomized block-design in a pine-bilberry forest in Western Norway. We tested whether we could activate defense responses in bilberry () by nine different treatments using clipping (leaf tissue or branch removal) with or without chemical treatment by methyljasmonate (MeJA). We subsequently measured consequences of induced defenses through vegetative growth and insect herbivory during one growing season. Our results showed that only MeJA-treated plants showed consistent defense responses through suppressed vegetative growth and reduced herbivory by leaf-chewing insects, suggesting an allocation of resources from growth to defense. Leaf tissue removal reduced insect herbivory equal to the effect of the MeJa treatments, but had no negative impact on growth. Branch removal did not reduce insect herbivory or vegetative growth. MeJa treatment and clipping combined did not give an additional defense response. In this study, we investigated how to induce defense responses in wild plant populations under natural field conditions. Our results show that using the chemical elicitor MeJA, with or without biomass clipping, may be a better method to induce defense response in field experiments than clipping of leaves or branches that often has been used in ecological field studies.
诱导型植物防御是植物的一种有益策略,这意味着当食草动物攻击时,植物应将资源从生长和繁殖分配到防御上。植物生态学家经常通过生物量修剪实验研究野生种群的防御反应,而实验室和温室实验还会使用化学诱导剂来诱导防御反应。为了研究野外生态学家是否能从实验室和温室研究中使用的方法中受益,我们在挪威西部的一片松树-越橘林中建立了随机区组设计。我们测试了是否可以通过九种不同处理来激活越橘()的防御反应,这些处理包括有或没有茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)化学处理的修剪(去除叶片组织或枝条)。随后,我们在一个生长季节中通过营养生长和昆虫食草作用测量了诱导防御的后果。我们的结果表明,只有经MeJA处理的植物通过抑制营养生长和减少食叶昆虫的食草作用表现出一致的防御反应,这表明资源从生长分配到了防御上。去除叶片组织减少了昆虫食草作用,其效果与MeJa处理相同,但对生长没有负面影响。去除枝条并没有减少昆虫食草作用或营养生长。MeJa处理和修剪相结合并没有产生额外的防御反应。在这项研究中,我们研究了如何在自然野外条件下诱导野生植物种群的防御反应。我们的结果表明,在野外实验中,使用化学诱导剂MeJA,无论有无生物量修剪,可能比生态野外研究中经常使用的去除叶片或枝条的方法更适合诱导防御反应。