Walter Joan E, Heuvelmans Marjolein A, Oudkerk Matthijs
University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Feb;6(1):42-51. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.11.05.
Currently, lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is widely recommended for high-risk individuals by US guidelines, but there still is an ongoing debate concerning respective recommendations for European countries. Nevertheless, the available data regarding pulmonary nodules released by lung cancer screening studies could improve future screening guidelines, as well as the clinical practice of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules on routine CT scans. Most lung cancer screening trials present results for baseline and incidence screening rounds separately, clustering pulmonary nodules initially found at baseline screening and newly detected pulmonary nodules after baseline screening together. This approach does not appreciate possible differences among pulmonary nodules detected at baseline and firstly detected at incidence screening rounds and is heavily influenced by methodological differences of the respective screening trials. This review intends to create a basis for assessing non-calcified pulmonary nodules detected during LDCT lung cancer screening in a more clinical relevant manner. The aim is to present data of non-calcified pulmonary baseline nodules and new non-calcified pulmonary incident nodules without clustering them together, thereby also simplifying translation to the clinical practice of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. Small pulmonary nodules newly detected at incidence screening rounds of LDCT lung cancer screening may possess a greater lung cancer probability than pulmonary baseline nodules at a smaller size, which is essential for the development of new guidelines.
目前,美国指南广泛推荐对高危个体进行低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查,但对于欧洲国家的相应建议仍存在争议。尽管如此,肺癌筛查研究公布的有关肺结节的现有数据可以改进未来的筛查指南,以及常规CT扫描偶然发现的肺结节的临床实践。大多数肺癌筛查试验分别给出基线筛查和发病筛查轮次的结果,将基线筛查时最初发现的肺结节和基线筛查后新发现的肺结节归为一类。这种方法没有认识到基线时检测到的肺结节与发病筛查轮次首次检测到的肺结节之间可能存在的差异,并且受到各自筛查试验方法差异的严重影响。本综述旨在为以更符合临床实际的方式评估LDCT肺癌筛查期间检测到的非钙化肺结节奠定基础。目的是呈现非钙化肺基线结节和新的非钙化肺发病结节的数据,而不将它们归为一类,从而也简化向偶然发现的肺结节临床实践的转化。在LDCT肺癌筛查发病筛查轮次新发现的小肺结节可能比尺寸较小的肺基线结节具有更高的肺癌概率,这对新指南的制定至关重要。