Martin T G, Hawkins N S, Weigel J A, Rider D E, Buckingham B D
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Division of Emergency Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033.
Am J Emerg Med. 1988 Mar;6(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90046-0.
The belief that defibrillation of unwitnessed ventricular fibrillation frequently results in asystole, combined with perceived low survival rates, led to deviation from "standard" advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) by physicians directing paramedics in the field. In nonstandard ACLS, intubation or drug therapy preceded defibrillation. This study retrospectively compared standard and nonstandard ACLS for ventricular fibrillation. The long-term survival rates were 12.3% (7/57) and 3.6% (6/168) for the two forms of ACLS, respectively (p = 0.03). The incidence of postcountershock asystole was 35% and 28% (p = 0.45). The survival rates for patients with a postcountershock rhythm and a pulse were 83% and 17% after standard and nonstandard ACLS (p less than 0.0001). Other factors reported to have a significant effect on survival were compared, and no significant differences (p greater than 0.05) were noted for mean age, sex, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated by a bystander, ACLS response time, time to CPR, lay-witnessed arrest, or time to definitive care. The significant difference in the time to defibrillation (14 and 26 minutes) was expected. This is the first clinical study to clearly confirm the ACLS recommendation of early defibrillation before drug therapy in ventricular fibrillation.
认为对未被目击的心室颤动进行除颤常常会导致心搏停止,再加上认为生存率较低,使得在现场指挥护理人员的医生偏离了“标准”的高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)。在非标准的ACLS中,在除颤之前先进行插管或药物治疗。本研究回顾性比较了标准和非标准ACLS用于心室颤动的情况。两种形式的ACLS的长期生存率分别为12.3%(7/57)和3.6%(6/168)(p = 0.03)。除颤后心搏停止的发生率分别为35%和28%(p = 0.45)。在标准和非标准ACLS后,除颤后有节律且有脉搏的患者的生存率分别为83%和17%(p < 0.0001)。对报告的其他对生存有显著影响的因素进行了比较,在平均年龄、性别、旁观者开始进行的心肺复苏(CPR)、ACLS反应时间、开始CPR的时间、有现场目击者的心脏骤停或确定性治疗时间方面未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。除颤时间的显著差异(14分钟和26分钟)在意料之中。这是第一项明确证实ACLS关于在心室颤动中药物治疗前早期除颤建议的临床研究。