Suppr超能文献

在恶劣环境下全血采集的体积控制。

Volumetric control of whole blood collection in austere environments.

作者信息

Meledeo Michael A, Fisher Andrew D, Peltier Grantham C, Miles Ethan A, Muse William B, Kerr Win B, Nessen Shawn C, Cap Andrew P

机构信息

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research (M.A.M., G.C.P., S.C.N., A.P.C.), JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, Texas; 75th Ranger Regiment, Fort Benning, Georgia (A.D.F., E.A.M.); Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas (A.D.F.); Columbus State University, Columbus, Georgia (W.B.M.); and Special Warfare Medical Group, Fort Bragg, North Carolina (W.B.K.).

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6S Suppl 1):S26-S32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001435.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fresh whole blood transfusions are a powerful tool in prehospital care; however, the lack of equipment such as a scale in field situations frequently leads to collections being under- or overfilled, leading to complications for both patient and physician. This study describes two methods for simple, rapid control of collection bag volume: (1) a length of material to constrict the bag, and (2) folding/clamping the bag.

METHOD

Whole blood collection bags were allowed to fill with saline via gravity. Paracord, zip-tie, beaded cable tie, or tourniquet was placed around the bag at circumferences of 6 to 8.75 inches. A hemostat was used to clamp folds of 1 to 1.5 inches. Several units were drawn during training exercises of the 75th Ranger Regiment with volume controlled by three methods: vision/touch estimation, constriction by paracord, and clamping with hemostat.

RESULTS

Method validation in the Terumo 450-mL bag indicated that paracord, zip-tie, and beaded cable tie lengths of 6.5 inches or clamping 1.25 inches with a hemostat provided accurate filling. The volume variance was significantly lower when using the beaded cable tie. Saline filling time was approximately 2 minutes. With the Fenwal 450-mL bag, the beaded cable tie gave best results; even if incorrectly placed by one/two beads, the volume was still within limits. In training exercises, the use of the cord/clamp greatly reduced the variability; more bags were within limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Both constricting and clamping allow for speed and consistency in blood collection. The use of common cord is appealing, but knot tying induces inevitable variability; a zip/cable tie is easier. Clamping was quicker but susceptible to high variance and bag rupturing. With proper methodological training, appropriate volumes can be obtained in any environment with minimal tools.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

摘要

引言

新鲜全血输注是院前急救中的一项有力工具;然而,在现场情况下缺乏诸如秤等设备常常导致采血袋装填不足或过量,给患者和医生都带来并发症。本研究描述了两种简单、快速控制采血袋容量的方法:(1)一段用于收紧袋子的材料,以及(2)折叠/夹紧袋子。

方法

让全血采血袋通过重力充满生理盐水。将伞绳、束线带、带珠束线带或止血带围绕袋子放置,周长为6至8.75英寸。使用止血钳夹住1至1.5英寸的褶皱。在第75游骑兵团的训练演习中抽取了多个单位的血液,通过三种方法控制容量:视觉/触觉估计、用伞绳收紧以及用止血钳夹紧。

结果

在泰尔茂450毫升采血袋中的方法验证表明,6.5英寸长的伞绳、束线带和带珠束线带或用止血钳夹紧1.25英寸可实现准确装填。使用带珠束线带时体积差异显著更低。生理盐水装填时间约为2分钟。对于芬华450毫升采血袋,带珠束线带效果最佳;即使放置时错了一/两颗珠子,体积仍在限度内。在训练演习中,使用绳子/夹子大大降低了变异性;更多袋子在限度内。

结论

收紧和夹紧都能实现采血的速度和一致性。使用普通绳子很方便,但打结会不可避免地产生变异性;束线带更容易操作。夹紧更快,但容易出现高变异性和袋子破裂。通过适当的方法训练,使用最少的工具就能在任何环境中获得合适的容量。

证据级别

治疗/护理管理研究,四级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验