• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于包含不可忽视的缺失基线值的连续结果的工具变量法。

Instrumental Variable Methods for Continuous Outcomes That Accommodate Nonignorable Missing Baseline Values.

作者信息

Ertefaie Ashkan, Flory James H, Hennessy Sean, Small Dylan S

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 15;185(12):1233-1239. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww137.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kww137
PMID:28338946
Abstract

Instrumental variable (IV) methods provide unbiased treatment effect estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounders under certain assumptions. To provide valid estimates of treatment effect, treatment effect confounders that are associated with the IV (IV-confounders) must be included in the analysis, and not including observations with missing values may lead to bias. Missing covariate data are particularly problematic when the probability that a value is missing is related to the value itself, which is known as nonignorable missingness. In such cases, imputation-based methods are biased. Using health-care provider preference as an IV method, we propose a 2-step procedure with which to estimate a valid treatment effect in the presence of baseline variables with nonignorable missing values. First, the provider preference IV value is estimated by performing a complete-case analysis using a random-effects model that includes IV-confounders. Second, the treatment effect is estimated using a 2-stage least squares IV approach that excludes IV-confounders with missing values. Simulation results are presented, and the method is applied to an analysis comparing the effects of sulfonylureas versus metformin on body mass index, where the variables baseline body mass index and glycosylated hemoglobin have missing values. Our result supports the association of sulfonylureas with weight gain.

摘要

在某些假设下,工具变量(IV)方法可在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下提供无偏的治疗效果估计。为了提供有效的治疗效果估计,与工具变量相关的治疗效果混杂因素(IV混杂因素)必须纳入分析,而不包括有缺失值的观察结果可能会导致偏差。当一个值缺失的概率与该值本身相关时,即所谓的不可忽略的缺失值,协变量数据缺失问题尤为严重。在这种情况下,基于插补的方法存在偏差。以医疗服务提供者的偏好作为一种工具变量方法,我们提出了一个两步程序,用于在存在具有不可忽略缺失值的基线变量的情况下估计有效的治疗效果。首先,通过使用包含IV混杂因素的随机效应模型进行完全病例分析来估计提供者偏好IV值。其次,使用两阶段最小二乘IV方法估计治疗效果,该方法排除具有缺失值的IV混杂因素。给出了模拟结果,并将该方法应用于一项比较磺脲类药物与二甲双胍对体重指数影响的分析中,其中基线体重指数和糖化血红蛋白变量存在缺失值。我们的结果支持磺脲类药物与体重增加之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Instrumental Variable Methods for Continuous Outcomes That Accommodate Nonignorable Missing Baseline Values.适用于包含不可忽视的缺失基线值的连续结果的工具变量法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 15;185(12):1233-1239. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww137.
2
Selection Bias When Using Instrumental Variable Methods to Compare Two Treatments But More Than Two Treatments Are Available.使用工具变量法比较两种治疗方法时的选择偏倚,但有两种以上治疗方法可供选择。
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):219-32. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0006.
3
The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.未测量的组内和组间混杂因素对连续暴露效应估计值偏倚的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2119-2139. doi: 10.1177/0962280219883323. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
A Two-Step Approach for Analysis of Nonignorable Missing Outcomes in Longitudinal Regression: an Application to Upstate KIDS Study.纵向回归中不可忽视的缺失结局分析的两步法:应用于纽约州北部儿童研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;31(5):468-478. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12382. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.缺失指标的多重插补作为未测量变量的代理:模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01068-x.
6
Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.使用大型观测数据集评估因果治疗效果估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0858-x.
7
On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.基于偏好的工具变量法在减少指示性未测量混杂因素方面的应用
Stat Med. 2015 Mar 30;34(7):1150-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.6404. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
Multiple imputation for systematically missing confounders within a distributed data drug safety network: A simulation study and real-world example.在分布式数据药物安全网络中针对系统缺失混杂因素进行多重插补:一项模拟研究和真实世界的实例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;29 Suppl 1:35-44. doi: 10.1002/pds.4876. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
The missing cause approach to unmeasured confounding in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中未测量混杂因素的缺失原因方法。
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 30;35(7):1001-16. doi: 10.1002/sim.6818. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
10
Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.有限范围变量插补方法的比较:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 26;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a UK population with type 2 diabetes and aged over 70 years: an instrumental variable approach.SGLT2 抑制剂在英国 2 型糖尿病且年龄超过 70 岁人群中的安全性和有效性:一种工具变量法。
Diabetologia. 2024 Sep;67(9):1817-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06190-9. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
2
Measurement error and misclassification in electronic medical records: methods to mitigate bias.电子病历中的测量误差和错误分类:减轻偏差的方法。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Dec;5(4):343-356. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0164-x. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Bayesian network-based missing mechanism identification (BN-MMI) method in medical research.
医学研究中基于贝叶斯网络的缺失机制识别(BN-MMI)方法
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 12;21(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01677-6.
4
Selection Bias When Estimating Average Treatment Effects Using One-sample Instrumental Variable Analysis.使用单一样本工具变量分析估计平均处理效应时的选择偏差。
Epidemiology. 2019 May;30(3):350-357. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000972.