• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄亥俄州 2010-2014 年各专科医生的阿片类药物处方情况。

Opioid Prescriptions by Specialty in Ohio, 2010-2014.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2018 May 1;19(5):978-989. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx027.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnx027
PMID:28339965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current US opioid epidemic is attributed to the large volume of prescribed opioids. This study analyzed the contribution of different medical specialties to overall opioids by evaluating the pill counts and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of opioid prescriptions, stratified by provider specialty, and determined temporal trends.

METHODS

This was an analysis of the Ohio prescription drug monitoring program database, which captures scheduled medication prescriptions filled in the state as well as prescriber specialty. We extracted prescriptions for pill versions of opioids written in the calendar years 2010 to 2014. The main outcomes were the number of filled prescriptions, pill counts, MMEs, and extended-released opioids written by physicians in each specialty, and annual prescribing trends.

RESULTS

There were 56,873,719 prescriptions for the studied opioids dispensed, for which 41,959,581 (73.8%) had prescriber specialty type available. Mean number of pills per prescription and MMEs were highest for physical medicine/rehabilitation (PM&R; 91.2 pills, 1,532 mg, N = 1,680,579), anesthesiology/pain (89.3 pills, 1,484 mg, N = 3,261,449), hematology/oncology (88.2 pills, 1,534 mg, N = 516,596), and neurology (84.4 pills, 1,230 mg, N = 573,389). Family medicine (21.8%) and internal medicine (17.6%) wrote the most opioid prescriptions overall. Time trends in the average number of pills and MMEs per prescription also varied depending on specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

The numbers of pills and MMEs per opioid prescription vary markedly by prescriber specialty, as do trends in prescribing characteristics. Pill count and MME values define each specialty's contribution to overall opioid prescribing more accurately than the number of prescriptions alone.

摘要

背景

当前美国阿片类药物泛滥的原因是大量开处阿片类药物。本研究通过评估按提供者专业划分的阿片类药物处方的药丸数和吗啡毫克当量(MME),分析了不同医学专业对整体阿片类药物的贡献,并确定了时间趋势。

方法

这是对俄亥俄州处方药物监测计划数据库的分析,该数据库捕获了该州的规定药物处方以及处方医生的专业。我们提取了 2010 年至 2014 年日历年度开具的阿片类药物丸剂处方。主要结果是每个专业的医生开具的已填充分装处方数量、药丸数量、MME 和延长释放阿片类药物数量,以及年度处方趋势。

结果

共开出了 56873719 份研究用阿片类药物处方,其中 41959581 份(73.8%)有处方医生专业类型。每处方药丸数和 MME 最高的专业是物理医学/康复(PM&R;91.2 粒,1532mg,N=1680579)、麻醉学/疼痛科(89.3 粒,1484mg,N=3261449)、血液学/肿瘤学(88.2 粒,1534mg,N=516596)和神经病学(84.4 粒,1230mg,N=573389)。家庭医学(21.8%)和内科(17.6%)开具的阿片类药物处方总数最多。每处方药丸数和 MME 的时间趋势也因专业而异。

结论

每个阿片类药物处方的药丸数和 MME 数量因医生专业而异,处方特征的趋势也各不相同。与单独的处方数量相比,药丸数和 MME 值更能准确地定义每个专业对整体阿片类药物处方的贡献。

相似文献

1
Opioid Prescriptions by Specialty in Ohio, 2010-2014.俄亥俄州 2010-2014 年各专科医生的阿片类药物处方情况。
Pain Med. 2018 May 1;19(5):978-989. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx027.
2
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
3
Mandatory Prescription Limits and Opioid Utilization Following Orthopaedic Surgery.强制性处方限制与骨科手术后阿片类药物的使用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 May 15;101(10):e43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00943.
4
Association of Lowering Default Pill Counts in Electronic Medical Record Systems With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.电子病历系统中降低默认药丸计数与术后阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1012-1019. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2083.
5
Prescription and Prescriber Specialty Characteristics of Initial Opioid Prescriptions Associated with Chronic Use.与长期使用相关的初始阿片类药物处方的处方及开处方者专业特征。
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3669-3678. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa293.
6
Changes in opioid prescribing after implementation of mandatory registration and proactive reports within California's prescription drug monitoring program.加利福尼亚州处方药物监测计划实施强制性登记和主动报告后,阿片类药物处方的变化。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108405. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108405. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
The Supply of Prescription Opioids: Contributions of Episodic-Care Prescribers and High-Quantity Prescribers.处方阿片类药物的供应:偶发性医疗保健开方者和高用量开方者的贡献。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):668-673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Opioids Dispensed in the U.S. by Prescribing Specialty, 2012-2017.2012 - 2017年美国按处方专科分类发放的阿片类药物
Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):e297-e301. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.10.022. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Opioid Prescribing After Implementation of Single Click Access to a State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Database in a Health System's Electronic Health Record.在医疗系统的电子健康记录中实现一键访问州级处方药物监测数据库后,阿片类药物的处方情况。
Pain Med. 2021 Oct 8;22(10):2218-2223. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab051.
10
The prescription drug monitoring program in a multifactorial approach to the opioid crisis: PDMP data, Pennsylvania, 2016-2020.多因素方法应对阿片类药物危机中的处方药物监测计划:PDMP 数据,宾夕法尼亚州,2016-2020 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09272-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing medical students' beliefs about the opioid crisis and their post-graduation plans: a cross-sectional study.评估医学生对阿片类药物危机的看法及其毕业后计划:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06765-z.
2
Opioid exit plans for tapering postoperative pain control in noncancer patients: a systematic review.非癌症患者术后疼痛控制逐渐减量的阿片类药物停用计划:一项系统评价
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jul 30;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00408-w.
3
Predicting the Physician's Specialty Using a Medical Prescription Database.
基于医疗处方数据库预测医师专业。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 16;2022:5871408. doi: 10.1155/2022/5871408. eCollection 2022.
4
Influence of Primary Care Provider Type on Chronic Pain Management Among Veterans.初级保健提供者类型对退伍军人慢性疼痛管理的影响。
J Nurs Regul. 2022 Apr;13(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/s2155-8256(22)00032-1. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
5
Influence of provider type on chronic pain prescribing patterns A systematic review.医疗服务提供者类型对慢性疼痛处方模式的影响:一项系统评价
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):474-488. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000673.
6
Abuse-Deterrent Opioids: A Survey of Physician Beliefs, Behaviors, and Psychology.滥用威慑型阿片类药物:医生信念、行为及心理调查
Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):133-151. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00343-z. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
7
Association of clinical competence, specialty and physician country of origin with opioid prescribing for chronic pain: a cohort study.临床能力、专业和医生原籍国与慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方的关联:一项队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 May;31(5):340-352. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013503. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
8
Opioid Prescribing After Implementation of Single Click Access to a State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Database in a Health System's Electronic Health Record.在医疗系统的电子健康记录中实现一键访问州级处方药物监测数据库后,阿片类药物的处方情况。
Pain Med. 2021 Oct 8;22(10):2218-2223. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab051.
9
Who prescribes drugs to patients: A Danish register-based study.谁给患者开处方药:一项丹麦基于登记的研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;87(7):2982-2987. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14691. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
10
Prescription and Prescriber Specialty Characteristics of Initial Opioid Prescriptions Associated with Chronic Use.与长期使用相关的初始阿片类药物处方的处方及开处方者专业特征。
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3669-3678. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa293.