Oral Cancer Reconstruction Using the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: Comparison to Free Radial Forearm Flap.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a sufficient alternative to the fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for oral reconstruction in cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study composed of all consecutive patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction after cancer surgery at their tertiary university hospital from 2013 to 2016. Demographics and peri- and postoperative information were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 83 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction after cancer, 50 were identified as having stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx and underwent surgery and reconstruction with the SCAIF (n = 25) or the RFFF (n = 25). Total surgery time (411.0 vs 576.4 minutes; P < .001), flap elevation time (39.00 vs 93.78 minutes; P < .001), need for intensive care observation (32 vs 96%; P < .05), and rate of tracheotomy (64 vs 88%; P < .05) were significantly lower in the SCAIF group. There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complication rate or postoperative functional swallowing ability between the 2 groups. Total perioperative costs were significantly lower in patients who underwent reconstruction with the SCAIF (2,621.15 vs 4,453.77€; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the SCAIF is a straightforward and reliable flap with shorter operative times and comparable outcomes compared with the RFFF.