Wang Ko-Fan, Wu Cheng-Hsueh, Chang Chun-Chin, Chen Lung-Ching, Wang Kang-Ling, Lu Tse-Min, Lin Shing-Jong, Chiang Chern-En
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University.
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University; ; Department of Cardiology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017 Mar;33(2):156-164. doi: 10.6515/acs20161215a.
There is a lack of knowledge of those contemporary factors associated with modifying subtherapeutic treatments in hypercholesterolemic patients. The aim of this study was to assess determinants of treatment modification in patients not attaining their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.
The CEntralized Pan-Asian survey on tHE Under-treatment of hypercholeSterolemia enrolled patients taking stable lipid-lowering medications. The study physicians then determined existing patient treatments, which were to be continued or modified when treatments failed. The patient questionnaire surveying patient attitudes and perceptions toward their hypercholesterolemia management was prospectively collected. The odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals) were calculated.
Among the 420 patients included for analysis, 35.7% were designated for planned treatment modification. Those patients assigned to treatment modification were more likely to have a family history of premature coronary heart disease (40% vs. 19%), an indication for secondary prevention (76% vs. 61%), elevated triglyceride (60% vs. 48%) and fasting sugar (84% vs. 67%), and were less adherent to their medications (29% vs. 12%) than patients assigned to treatment continuation. Patient recognition of treatment failure [OR, 1.82 (1.13-2.94)], the lower frequency of cholesterol checkup [OR, 2.40 (1.41-4.08)], patient satisfaction with provided cholesterol information [OR, 2.30 (1.21-4.39)], and their feelings toward cholesterol management [OR, 0.25 (0.10-0.62) and 3.80 (2.28-6.32)] for confusion and no strong feeling, respectively were determinants of the treatment modification assignment.
There was a large gap between evidence-based goals and modification of subtherapeutic treatments, particularly among patients with lower treatment satisfaction and better compliance. Our findings have emphasized the need to further reduce inertia in implementing hypercholesterolemia management.
目前对于与调整高胆固醇血症患者亚治疗方案相关的当代因素缺乏了解。本研究旨在评估未达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的患者治疗调整的决定因素。
泛亚高胆固醇血症治疗不足集中调查纳入了正在服用稳定降脂药物的患者。研究医生随后确定现有的患者治疗方案,当治疗失败时这些方案将继续或调整。前瞻性收集了患者关于其高胆固醇血症管理的态度和认知的问卷调查。计算了比值比(OR)(95%置信区间)。
在纳入分析的420例患者中,35.7%被指定进行计划中的治疗调整。与被指定继续治疗的患者相比,那些被指定进行治疗调整的患者更有可能有早发冠心病家族史(40%对19%)、二级预防指征(76%对61%)、甘油三酯升高(60%对48%)和空腹血糖升高(84%对67%),并且药物依从性更低(29%对12%)。患者对治疗失败的认知[OR,1.82(1.13 - 2.94)]、胆固醇检查频率较低[OR,2.40(1.41 - 4.08)]、患者对所提供胆固醇信息的满意度[OR,2.30(1.21 - 4.39)]以及他们对胆固醇管理的感受[分别为因困惑而无强烈感受的OR,0.25(0.10 - 0.62)和有强烈感受的OR,3.80(2.28 - 6.32)]是治疗调整分配的决定因素。
循证目标与亚治疗方案调整之间存在很大差距,尤其是在治疗满意度较低且依从性较好的患者中。我们的研究结果强调了进一步减少高胆固醇血症管理实施过程中惰性的必要性。