Bowe Benjamin, Xie Yan, Xian Hong, Li Tingting, Al-Aly Ziyad
Clinical Epidemiology Center, Research and Education Service and.
Department of Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):603-613. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09710916. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Experimental evidence suggests a role for monocytes in the biology of kidney disease progression; however, whether monocyte count is associated with risk of incident CKD, CKD progression, and ESRD has not been examined in large epidemiologic studies.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We built a longitudinal observational cohort of 1,594,700 United States veterans with at least one eGFR during fiscal year 2004 (date of last eGFR during this period designated time zero) and no prior history of ESRD, dialysis, or kidney transplant. Cohort participants were followed until September 30, 2013 or death. Monocyte count closest to and before time zero was categorized in quartiles: quartile 1, >0.00 to ≤0.40 thousand cells per cubic millimeter (k/cmm); quartile 2, >0.40 to ≤0.55 k/cmm; quartile 3, >0.55 to ≤0.70 k/cmm; and quartile 4, >0.70 k/cmm. Survival models were built to examine the association between monocyte count and risk of incident eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m, risk of incident CKD, and risk of CKD progression defined as doubling of serum creatinine, eGFR decline ≥30%, or the composite outcome of ESRD, dialysis, or renal transplantation.
Over a median follow-up of 9.2 years (interquartile range, 8.3-9.4); in adjusted survival models, there was a graded association between monocyte counts and risk of renal outcomes. Compared with quartile 1, quartile 4 was associated with higher risk of incident eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 1.14) and risk of incident CKD (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.16). Quartile 4 was associated with higher risk of doubling of serum creatinine (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 1.24), ≥30% eGFR decline (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 1.19), and the composite renal end point (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 1.22). Cubic spline analyses of the relationship between monocyte count levels and renal outcomes showed a linear relationship, in which risk was higher with higher monocyte count. Results were robust to changes in sensitivity analyses.
Our results show a significant association between higher monocyte count and risks of incident CKD and CKD progression to ESRD.
实验证据表明单核细胞在肾脏疾病进展生物学中发挥作用;然而,单核细胞计数是否与新发慢性肾脏病(CKD)、CKD进展及终末期肾病(ESRD)风险相关,尚未在大型流行病学研究中得到检验。
设计、研究地点、参与者及测量指标:我们建立了一个纵向观察队列,纳入1594700名美国退伍军人,这些退伍军人在2004财年至少有一次估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(将该时间段内最后一次eGFR的日期指定为时间零点),且无ESRD、透析或肾移植病史。对队列参与者进行随访直至2013年9月30日或死亡。将最接近且在时间零点之前的单核细胞计数分为四分位数:四分位数1,>0.00至≤0.40千个细胞每立方毫米(k/cmm);四分位数2,>0.40至≤0.55 k/cmm;四分位数3,>0.55至≤0.70 k/cmm;四分位数4,>0.70 k/cmm。构建生存模型以检验单核细胞计数与新发eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m的风险、新发CKD风险以及定义为血清肌酐翻倍、eGFR下降≥30%或ESRD、透析或肾移植复合结局的CKD进展风险之间的关联。
在中位随访9.2年(四分位间距,8.3 - 9.4年)期间;在调整后的生存模型中,单核细胞计数与肾脏结局风险之间存在分级关联。与四分位数1相比,四分位数4与新发eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m的风险更高相关(风险比,1.13;95%置信区间,1.12至1.14)以及新发CKD风险更高相关(风险比,1.15;95%置信区间, 1.13至1.16)。四分位数4与血清肌酐翻倍风险更高相关(风险比,1.22;95%置信区间,1.20至1.24)、eGFR下降≥30%风险更高相关(风险比,1.18;95%置信区间,1.17至1.19)以及复合肾脏终点风险更高相关(风险比,1.19;95%置信区间,1.16至1.22)。对单核细胞计数水平与肾脏结局之间关系的三次样条分析显示为线性关系,其中单核细胞计数越高风险越高。敏感性分析结果稳健。
我们的结果表明较高的单核细胞计数与新发CKD风险以及CKD进展至ESRD风险之间存在显著关联。