Martínez-Velázquez Eduardo S, Honoré Jacques, de Zorzi Lucas, Ramos-Loyo Julieta, Sequeira Henrique
Laboratorio de Psicofisiologia, Institute of Neuroscience, University of GuadalajaraGuadalajara, Mexico; Facultad de Psicología, Meritorious Autonomous University of PueblaPuebla, Mexico.
DEEP Team, SCALab, UMR 9193, CNRS & University of Lille Lille, France.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00361. eCollection 2017.
Emotional difficulties in alexithymia and their social consequences have been linked to alterations in autonomic nervous system. However, most of previous studies did not take into account the distinction between the affective and the cognitive dimensions of the alexithymia, leading to inconsistent results. In this study, we compared the effects of both dimensions of alexithymia on the autonomic arousal to emotional and social visual stimulations. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) to items of the International Affective Pictures System characterized by emotional (unpleasant, neutral, and pleasant), social (with humans) or non-social (without humans) content were recorded in non-alexithymic (NA), affective (AA) and cognitive alexithymic (CA) participants, selected on the basis of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire. All participants responded to questionnaires of empathy, social phobia, depression, and anxiety before the experiment and evaluated the arousal of the pictures after it. Cognitive alexithymic group showed lower amplitudes of SCRs to pictures with social than without social relevance whereas the opposite pattern was observed for the NA group. Arousal emotional effects of the pictures on SCRs did not differ among groups. In addition, CA participants showed lower scores than NA in the Personal Taking sub-scale of the empathy questionnaire, while AA showed lower scores than NA in the fantasy sub-scale. The CA group showed higher social phobia, depression and anxiety scores, than the other two groups. This work has two original outcomes: first, affective alexithymics expressed lower empathic affective scores than other groups; second, alexithymia modulated the impact of the social relevance of the stimuli on the autonomic reactivity, this impact vanishing in affective alexithymics and reversing in cognitive alexithymics. Thus, though the groups could not be distinguished on the basis of emotional effect on SCRs, they clearly differed when the empathic characteristics and the autonomic impact of social relevance were considered. Finally, the described autonomic signature to social relevant information could contribute to elucidate the difficulty of alexithymics to deal with emotions during social transactions.
述情障碍中的情绪困难及其社会后果与自主神经系统的改变有关。然而,之前的大多数研究没有考虑到述情障碍在情感维度和认知维度上的区别,导致结果不一致。在本研究中,我们比较了述情障碍的两个维度对情绪和社会视觉刺激引起的自主唤醒的影响。在根据多伦多述情障碍量表和伯蒙德 - 沃斯特述情障碍问卷挑选出的非述情障碍(NA)、情感型述情障碍(AA)和认知型述情障碍(CA)参与者中,记录了他们对国际情感图片系统中具有情感(不愉快、中性和愉快)、社会(有人)或非社会(无人)内容的图片的皮肤电反应(SCR)。所有参与者在实验前回答了共情、社交恐惧症、抑郁和焦虑问卷,并在实验后评估了图片引起的唤醒程度。认知型述情障碍组对具有社会相关性的图片的SCR幅度低于对无社会相关性图片的SCR幅度,而NA组则呈现相反的模式。图片对SCR的唤醒情绪效应在各组之间没有差异。此外,CA参与者在共情问卷的个人投入子量表中的得分低于NA参与者,而AA参与者在幻想子量表中的得分低于NA参与者。CA组的社交恐惧症、抑郁和焦虑得分高于其他两组。这项研究有两个原创性成果:第一,情感型述情障碍者的共情情感得分低于其他组;第二,述情障碍调节了刺激的社会相关性对自主反应性的影响,这种影响在情感型述情障碍者中消失,在认知型述情障碍者中则相反。因此,尽管根据对SCR的情绪效应无法区分各组,但在考虑共情特征和社会相关性的自主影响时,它们明显不同。最后,所描述的对社会相关信息的自主特征可能有助于阐明述情障碍者在社交互动中处理情绪的困难。