• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于一般数据包络分析的城市可持续性效率评估:以中国西部和东部两个城市为例

Assessment of urban sustainability efficiency based on general data envelopment analysis: a case study of two cities in western and eastern China.

作者信息

Yan Yan, Shan Peng, Wang Chenxing, Quan Yuan, Wu Di, Zhao Chunli, Wu Gang, Deng Hongbing

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, People's Republic of China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):191. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5814-9. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-5814-9
PMID:28357717
Abstract

Sustainable urban development focuses on enhancing urban well-being, while also balancing the demands of urban social and economic development, natural resource consumption, and environmental pollution. This work used general data envelopment analysis to assess the urban sustainability efficiency (USE) and sustainability potential (SP) in Lanzhou and Xiamen, two cities that are characteristic of urban areas in western and eastern China. The assessment indicator system included important natural and urban welfare factors as input and output indices, respectively. The results showed that overall urban sustainability efficiency increased in Lanzhou and Xiamen from 1985 to 2010, but that the sustainability of natural resources clearly decreased. The urban sustainability efficiency of Xiamen was higher than that of Lanzhou, and the sustainability potential of Xiamen was lower than that of Lanzhou; this indicates that Xiamen performed better in terms of urban sustainable development. The urban sustainability efficiency in Xiamen has increased with increasing urban population, and the rate and scale of economic development have been higher than in Lanzhou. The assessment and analysis performed in this study show that cities with different natural resources and development characteristics have different forms, patterns, and trajectories of sustainable development.

摘要

可持续城市发展注重提升城市福祉,同时平衡城市社会经济发展、自然资源消耗和环境污染等需求。本研究采用一般数据包络分析方法,对中国西部和东部具有城市代表性的两个城市——兰州和厦门的城市可持续发展效率(USE)和可持续发展潜力(SP)进行评估。评估指标体系分别将重要的自然和城市福祉因素作为投入和产出指标。结果表明,1985年至2010年期间,兰州和厦门的城市可持续发展效率总体呈上升趋势,但自然资源的可持续性明显下降。厦门的城市可持续发展效率高于兰州,而厦门的可持续发展潜力低于兰州;这表明厦门在城市可持续发展方面表现更好。厦门的城市可持续发展效率随着城市人口的增加而提高,经济发展速度和规模高于兰州。本研究进行的评估与分析表明,具有不同自然资源和发展特征的城市,其可持续发展的形式、模式和轨迹各不相同。

相似文献

1
Assessment of urban sustainability efficiency based on general data envelopment analysis: a case study of two cities in western and eastern China.基于一般数据包络分析的城市可持续性效率评估:以中国西部和东部两个城市为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):191. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5814-9. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
[Urban sustainability assessment based on eco-efficiency and its application].基于生态效率的城市可持续性评估及其应用
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2010 Apr;31(4):1108-13.
3
[Sustainable development of the three economic patterns in China: The application of genuine progress indicator in the sustainability assessment of six typical cities.].[中国三种经济模式的可持续发展:真实进步指标在中国六个典型城市可持续性评估中的应用。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Jun;27(6):1785-1794. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.021.
4
Rapid assessment of sustainability in Mainland China.中国大陆可持续性快速评估。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Mar-Apr;91(4):1021-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
5
A Comparative Analysis on Assessment of Land Carrying Capacity with Ecological Footprint Analysis and Index System Method.基于生态足迹分析法与指标体系法的土地承载力评估比较分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0130315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130315. eCollection 2015.
6
Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China.基于三维生态足迹和人类发展指数的可持续性评价:以中国四大岛屿地区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jul 1;265:110509. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110509. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China.中国自然资源投入与非期望产出视角下的城市土地利用效率的空间计量分析——以中国 287 个城市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;17(19):7297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197297.
8
Measuring Regional Eco-Efficiency in China (2003-2016): A "Full World" Perspective and Network Data Envelopment Analysis.中国区域生态效率测度研究(2003-2016):一个“全要素”视角和网络数据包络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):3456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103456.
9
A modified eco-efficiency framework and methodology for advancing the state of practice of sustainability analysis as applied to green infrastructure.一种经过改进的生态效率框架和方法,用于推动应用于绿色基础设施的可持续性分析的实践水平。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Sep;13(5):821-831. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1928. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
An Assessment of Chinese Pathways to Implement the UN Sustainable Development Goal-11 (SDG-11)-A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration.评估中国实现联合国可持续发展目标 11(SDG-11)的路径——以上海长江三角洲城市群为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 28;16(13):2288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132288.

本文引用的文献

1
A framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs.一个用于监测环境项目中的社会过程和成果的框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Dec;47:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
2
An eco-sustainable green approach for heavy metals management: two case studies of developing industrial region.生态可持续的重金属管理绿色方法:两个发展中工业地区的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jan;184(1):421-48. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1978-x. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
3
Exploration of sustainable development by applying green economy indicators.
应用绿色经济指标探索可持续发展。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Nov;182(1-4):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1875-3. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
4
Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems.多维系统常见可持续性指数的优势与不足。
Environ Int. 2008 Feb;34(2):277-91. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Oct 18.