Gowans Lord Jephthah Joojo, Busch Tamara D, Mossey Peter A, Eshete Mekonen A, Adeyemo Wasiu L, Aregbesola Babatunde, Donkor Peter, Arthur Fareed K N, Agbenorku Pius, Olutayo James, Twumasi Peter, Braimah Rahman, Oti Alexander A, Plange-Rhule Gyikua, Obiri-Yeboah Solomon, Abate Fikre, Hoyte-Williams Paa E, Hailu Taye, Murray Jeffrey C, Butali Azeez
Department of Biochemistry and BiotechnologyKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST)KumasiGhana; Cleft ClinicKomfo Anokye Teaching HospitalKumasiGhana; Department of PaediatricsUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowa; Department of Oral PathologyRadiology and MedicineUniversity of IowaIowa CityIowa.
Department of Oral Pathology Radiology and Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017 Jan 12;5(2):164-171. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.273. eCollection 2017 Mar.
BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts are congenital malformations of the orofacial region, with a global incidence of one per 700 live births. Interferon Regulatory Factor 6 () (OMIM:607199) gene has been associated with the etiology of both syndromic and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts. The aim of this study was to show evidence of potentially pathogenic variants in in orofacial clefts cohorts from Africa. METHODS: We carried out Sanger Sequencing on DNA from 184 patients with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts and 80 individuals with multiple congenital anomalies that presented with orofacial clefts. We sequenced all the nine exons of as well as the 5' and 3' untranslated regions. In our analyses pipeline, we used various bioinformatics tools to detect and describe the potentially etiologic variants. RESULTS: We observed that potentially etiologic exonic and splice site variants were nonrandomly distributed among the nine exons of , with 92% of these variants occurring in exons 4 and 7. Novel variants were also observed in both nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (p.Glu69Lys, p.Asn185Thr, c.175-2A>C and c.1060+26C>T) and multiple congenital anomalies (p.Gly65Val, p.Lys320Asn and c.379+1G>T) patients. Our data also show evidence of compound heterozygotes that may modify phenotypes that emanate from variants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that exons 4 and 7 of are mutational 'hotspots' in our cohort and that mutants-induced orofacial clefts may be prevalent in the Africa population, however, with variable penetrance and expressivity. These observations are relevant for detection of high-risk families as well as genetic counseling. In conclusion, we have shown that there may be a need to combine both molecular and clinical evidence in the grouping of orofacial clefts into syndromic and nonsyndromic forms.
背景:口面部裂隙是口面部区域的先天性畸形,全球发病率为每700例活产中有1例。干扰素调节因子6(IRF6)(OMIM:607199)基因与综合征性和非综合征性口面部裂隙的病因相关。本研究的目的是在来自非洲的口面部裂隙队列中显示IRF6潜在致病变异的证据。 方法:我们对184例非综合征性口面部裂隙患者和80例伴有口面部裂隙的多发先天性畸形个体的DNA进行了桑格测序。我们对IRF6的所有九个外显子以及5'和3'非翻译区进行了测序。在我们的分析流程中,我们使用了各种生物信息学工具来检测和描述潜在的病因变异。 结果:我们观察到潜在的病因性外显子和剪接位点变异在IRF6的九个外显子中呈非随机分布,其中92%的这些变异发生在外显子4和7中。在非综合征性口面部裂隙(p.Glu69Lys、p.Asn185Thr、c.175-2A>C和c.1060+26C>T)和多发先天性畸形(p.Gly65Val、p.Lys320Asn和c.379+1G>T)患者中也观察到了新的变异。我们的数据还显示了复合杂合子的证据,这些复合杂合子可能会改变由IRF6变异产生的表型。 结论:本研究表明,IRF6的外显子4和7是我们队列中的突变“热点”,并且IRF6突变引起的口面部裂隙在非洲人群中可能很普遍,然而,其外显率和表达率各不相同。这些观察结果对于高危家庭的检测以及遗传咨询具有重要意义。总之,我们已经表明,在将口面部裂隙分为综合征性和非综合征性形式时,可能需要结合分子和临床证据。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017-1-12
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014-1-27
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023-5
Dev Dyn. 2016-3
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023-5
J Craniofac Surg.
Hum Mol Genet. 2020-3-27
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014-1-27
Hum Mol Genet. 2014-5-15
Am J Hum Genet. 2013-12-19
Front Oral Biol. 2012