Guruge Sepali, Ford-Gilboe Marilyn, Varcoe Colleen, Jayasuriya-Illesinghe Vathsala, Ganesan Mahesan, Sivayogan Sivagurunathan, Kanthasamy Parvathy, Shanmugalingam Pushparani, Vithanarachchi Hemamala
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0174801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174801. eCollection 2017.
Exposure to armed conflict and/or war have been linked to an increase in intimate partner violence (IPV) against women. A substantial body of work has focused on non-partner rape and sexual violence in war and post-war contexts, but research about IPV is limited, particularly in Asian settings. This paper presents the finding of a study conducted in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka. The study explored women's experiences of and responses to IPV as well as how health and social service providers perceive the problem. It also explored the IPV-related services and supports available after the end of a 30-year civil war.
We conducted in-depth, qualitative interviews with 15 women who had experienced IPV and 15 service providers who were knowledgeable about IPV in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka. Interviews were translated into English, coded and organized using NVivo8, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Participants described IPV as a widespread but hidden problem. Women had experienced various forms of abusive and controlling behaviours, some of which reflect the reality of living in the post-war context. The psychological effects of IPV were common, but were often attributed to war-related trauma. Some men used violence to control women and to reinstate power when their gender roles were reversed or challenged due to war and post-war changes in livelihoods. While some service providers perceived an increase in awareness about IPV and more services to address it, this was discordant with women's fears, feelings of oppression, and perception of a lack of redress from IPV within a highly militarized and ethnically-polarized society. Most women did not consider leaving an abusive relationship to be an option, due to realistic fears about their vulnerability to community violence, the widespread social norms that would cast them as outsiders, and the limited availability of related services and supports.
These findings revealed the need for more research about IPV in post-war contexts. Women's experiences in such contexts are influenced and may be masked by a complex set of factors that intersect to produce IPV and entrap women in violence. A more nuanced understanding of the context-specific issues that shape women's experiences of IPV- and community responses to it-is needed to develop more comprehensive solutions that are relevant to the local context.
接触武装冲突和/或战争与针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力行为增加有关。大量工作聚焦于战争及战后背景下的非伴侣强奸和性暴力,但关于亲密伴侣暴力的研究有限,尤其是在亚洲地区。本文介绍了在斯里兰卡东部省开展的一项研究的结果。该研究探讨了妇女对亲密伴侣暴力的经历和应对方式,以及卫生和社会服务提供者对这一问题的看法。它还探讨了在内战结束30年后可获得的与亲密伴侣暴力相关的服务和支持。
我们对15名经历过亲密伴侣暴力的妇女和15名了解斯里兰卡东部省亲密伴侣暴力情况的服务提供者进行了深入的定性访谈。访谈内容被翻译成英文,使用NVivo8进行编码和整理,并采用归纳主题分析法进行分析。
参与者将亲密伴侣暴力描述为一个普遍但隐蔽的问题。妇女经历了各种形式的虐待和控制行为,其中一些反映了战后背景下的现实情况。亲密伴侣暴力的心理影响很常见,但往往被归因于与战争相关的创伤。一些男性使用暴力来控制女性,并在由于战争和战后生计变化导致性别角色颠倒或受到挑战时恢复权力。虽然一些服务提供者认为对亲密伴侣暴力的认识有所提高,且有更多服务来应对这一问题,但这与妇女的恐惧、压迫感以及在高度军事化和种族两极分化的社会中对亲密伴侣暴力缺乏补救的看法不一致。由于对自身易受社区暴力侵害的现实恐惧、将她们视为局外人的普遍社会规范以及相关服务和支持的有限可得性,大多数妇女不认为离开虐待关系是一种选择。
这些发现表明需要对战后背景下的亲密伴侣暴力进行更多研究。在这种背景下,妇女的经历受到一系列复杂因素的影响,这些因素相互交织产生亲密伴侣暴力并使妇女陷入暴力之中,可能会被掩盖。需要更细致入微地理解塑造妇女亲密伴侣暴力经历以及社区对此反应的具体背景问题,以制定与当地情况相关的更全面解决方案。