Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, United States; The Department of Medicine at the University of Washington, 98109, United States.
J Control Release. 2017 Jun 10;255:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.388. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Tumor heterogeneity, which describes the genetically and phenotypically distinct subpopulations of tumor cells present within the same tumor or patient, presents a major challenge to targeted delivery of diagnostic and/or therapeutic agents. An ideal targeting strategy should deliver a given nanocarrier to the full diversity of cancer cells, which is difficult to achieve with conventional ligand-conjugated nanoparticles. We evaluated pretargeting (i.e., multistep targeting) as a strategy to facilitate nanoparticle delivery to multiple target cells by measuring the uptake of biotinylated nanoparticles by lymphoma cells with distinct surface antigens pretreated with different bispecific streptavidin-scFv fusion proteins. Fusion proteins targeting CD20 or tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) mediated the specific in vitro uptake of 100nm biotin-functionalized nanoparticles by Raji and Jurkat lymphoma cells (CD20-positive and TAG-72-positive cells, respectively). Greater uptake was observed for pretargeted nanoparticles with increasing amounts of surface biotin, with 6- to 18-fold higher uptake vs. non-biotinylated nanoparticle and fusion protein controls. Fully biotin-modified particles remained resistant to cultured macrophage cell uptake, although they were still quickly cleared from systemic circulation in vivo (t<1h). For single Raji tumor-bearing mice, pretargeting with CD20-specific FP significantly increased nanoparticle tumor targeting. In mice bearing both Raji and Jurkat tumors, pretargeting with both fusion proteins markedly increased nanoparticle targeting to both tumor types, compared to animals dosed with nanoparticles alone. These in vitro and in vivo observations support further evaluations of pretargeting fusion protein cocktails as a strategy to enhance nanoparticle delivery to a diverse array of molecularly distinct target cells.
肿瘤异质性描述了同一肿瘤或患者内存在的肿瘤细胞在遗传和表型上的不同亚群,这给诊断和/或治疗剂的靶向递药带来了重大挑战。理想的靶向策略应该将特定的纳米载体递送到所有癌症细胞,而这一目标很难通过常规配体偶联的纳米颗粒来实现。我们通过评估生物素化纳米颗粒被具有不同表面抗原的淋巴瘤细胞摄取的情况,评估了前靶向(即多步骤靶向)作为一种促进纳米颗粒递送到多个靶细胞的策略,这些淋巴瘤细胞经不同的双特异性链霉亲和素-单链抗体融合蛋白预处理。靶向 CD20 或肿瘤相关糖蛋白 72(TAG-72)的融合蛋白介导了 100nm 生物素化纳米颗粒被 Raji 和 Jurkat 淋巴瘤细胞(分别为 CD20 阳性和 TAG-72 阳性细胞)的特异性体外摄取。与非生物素化纳米颗粒和融合蛋白对照相比,随着表面生物素化数量的增加,前靶向纳米颗粒的摄取量更高,观察到的摄取量增加了 6-18 倍。完全生物素化的颗粒仍然抵抗培养的巨噬细胞摄取,尽管它们在体内仍很快从全身循环中清除(t<1h)。对于单个携带 Raji 肿瘤的小鼠,用 CD20 特异性 FP 进行前靶向显著增加了纳米颗粒的肿瘤靶向性。在同时携带 Raji 和 Jurkat 肿瘤的小鼠中,与单独用纳米颗粒处理的动物相比,用两种融合蛋白进行前靶向显著增加了两种肿瘤类型的纳米颗粒靶向性。这些体外和体内观察结果支持进一步评估前靶向融合蛋白鸡尾酒作为一种策略,以增强纳米颗粒递送到多样化的分子上不同的靶细胞。