• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术与光折射性角膜切削术:对眼表状况的影响。

Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy: Effect on ocular surface condition.

机构信息

From Centro de Oftalmología Barraquer (Sauvageot, Julio, Alvarez de Toledo, Charoenrook, Barraquer), the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Sauvageot, Alvarez de Toledo, Charoenrook), the Optics and Optometry Department (Julio), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Tech, Terrassa, and the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (Barraquer), Barcelona, Spain.

From Centro de Oftalmología Barraquer (Sauvageot, Julio, Alvarez de Toledo, Charoenrook, Barraquer), the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Sauvageot, Alvarez de Toledo, Charoenrook), the Optics and Optometry Department (Julio), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Tech, Terrassa, and the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (Barraquer), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Feb;43(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.019
PMID:28366362
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare ocular surface characteristics in eyes after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative observational study.

METHODS

Patients with myopia who had femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK or PRK were included. Tear osmolarity, the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, Schirmer I, corneal sensitivity, tear breakup time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining were evaluated preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for temporal intragroup analysis, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for intergroup comparisons.

RESULTS

The study comprised 44 patients (44 eyes) with myopia. Comparison of the parameters between the femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK group (22 eyes) and the PRK group (22 eyes) showed a similar temporal progression postoperatively. Compared with the preoperative evaluation, corneal sensitivity decreased after 3 months (P = .002 and P = .02, respectively) and 6 months (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively). The TBUT reached the highest mean value after 12 months (P = .01 and P = .04, respectively), and tear osmolarity was slightly increased after 1 year, although the mean values remained within the normal range (P = .01 and P = .04, respectively). The only difference between the 2 groups was lower corneal sensitivity in the femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK group after 3 months (P = .02). The ocular surface condition could be considered clinically unaltered after 1 year in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and PRK techniques seemed to be safe for the ocular surface condition and to have a similar effect on it.

摘要

目的

比较飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)或光性折射角膜切削术(PRK)术后的眼表特征。

设置

西班牙巴塞罗那 Barraquer 眼科中心。

设计

前瞻性比较观察性研究。

方法

纳入近视患者,他们接受了飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 或 PRK。术前和术后 3、6 和 12 个月评估泪液渗透压、眼表疾病指数问卷、Schirmer I 试验、角膜知觉、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和角膜荧光素染色。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验用于组内时间的比较,Mann-Whitney U 检验用于组间比较。

结果

这项研究包括 44 名(44 只眼)近视患者。飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 组(22 只眼)和 PRK 组(22 只眼)之间的参数比较显示术后有相似的时间进展。与术前评估相比,术后 3 个月(P=.002 和 P=.02)和 6 个月(P=.03 和 P=.04)时角膜知觉下降。TBUT 在 12 个月时达到最高平均水平(P=.01 和 P=.04),泪液渗透压在 1 年后略有升高,尽管平均值仍在正常范围内(P=.01 和 P=.04)。两组之间的唯一区别是飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 组术后 3 个月时角膜知觉较低(P=.02)。两组术后 1 年均认为眼表状况无明显变化。

结论

飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 和 PRK 技术似乎对眼表状况是安全的,对其影响也相似。

相似文献

1
Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy: Effect on ocular surface condition.飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术与光折射性角膜切削术:对眼表状况的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Feb;43(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.019.
2
Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis.经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视:一年病例匹配分析。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Nov;42(11):1579-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025.
3
Chronic dry eye in photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifestations, incidence, and predictive factors.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术和激光角膜上皮瓣下磨镶术中的慢性干眼:表现、发生率及预测因素
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2624-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.037.
4
Nerve growth factor concentration and implications in photorefractive keratectomy vs laser in situ keratomileusis.神经生长因子浓度及其在准分子激光角膜切削术与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中的意义
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):965-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.051.
5
Corneal barrier function, tear film stability, and corneal sensation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子激光角膜切削术和准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的角膜屏障功能、泪膜稳定性及角膜感觉
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.039.
6
Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison using a double-pass system.近视光折射性角膜切削术和激光原位角膜磨镶术后的光学质量:使用双通系统的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.037.
7
Changes in custom biomechanical variables after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光角膜切削术治疗近视后自定义生物力学变量的变化。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):918-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.030. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Longitudinal evaluation of posterior corneal elevation after laser refractive surgery using swept-source optical coherence tomography.应用扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪对激光屈光手术后后角膜隆起的纵向评估。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
9
Comparison of tear secretion and tear film instability after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光角膜切削术后泪液分泌及泪膜稳定性的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Sep;26(9):1326-31. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00566-6.
10
Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality.飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的比较:18个月视力及视觉质量对比
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0364-7. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dry eye disease treatment following refractive surgery among young patients: a population-based study.年轻患者屈光手术后的干眼症治疗:一项基于人群的研究。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03783-5.
2
Dry Eye Disease following LASIK, PRK, and LASEK: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.准分子原位角膜磨镶术、准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术和机械法准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术后的干眼疾病:一项观察性横断面研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 30;12(11):3761. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113761.
3
Traumatic displacement of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps: an integrated clinical case presentation.
准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)瓣的外伤性移位:综合临床病例报告
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01938-y.
4
Impact of corneal refractive surgery on the precorneal tear film.角膜屈光手术对角膜前泪膜的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2804-2812. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2296_19.
5
Impact of topical anti-fibrotics on corneal nerve regeneration in vivo.局部抗纤维化药物对体内角膜神经再生的影响。
Exp Eye Res. 2019 Apr;181:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Effects of ambient humidity on the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.环境湿度对科谢-博内压力觉计的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Oct;32(10):1644-1651. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0150-z. Epub 2018 Jun 19.