Rangelov Dragan, Müller Hermann J, Zehetleitner Michael
Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland Brisbane.
Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 May;146(5):651-671. doi: 10.1037/xge0000284. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Pop-out search implies that the target is always the first item selected, no matter how many distractors are presented. However, increasing evidence indicates that search is not entirely independent of display density even for pop-out targets: search is slower with sparse (few distractors) than with dense displays (many distractors). Despite its significance, the cause of this anomaly remains unclear. We investigated several mechanisms that could slow down search for pop-out targets. Consistent with the assumption that pop-out targets frequently fail to pop out in sparse displays, we observed greater variability of search duration for sparse displays relative to dense. Computational modeling of the response time distributions also supported the view that pop-out targets fail to pop out in sparse displays. Our findings strongly question the classical assumption that early processing of pop-out targets is independent of the distractors. Rather, the density of distractors critically influences whether or not a stimulus pops out. These results call for new, more reliable measures of pop-out search and potentially a reinterpretation of studies that used relatively sparse displays. (PsycINFO Database Record
突出显示搜索意味着无论呈现多少干扰项,目标总是被选中的第一个项目。然而,越来越多的证据表明,即使对于突出显示的目标,搜索也并非完全独立于显示密度:与密集显示(许多干扰项)相比,稀疏显示(很少干扰项)的搜索速度更慢。尽管这一现象很重要,但其原因仍不清楚。我们研究了几种可能减缓突出显示目标搜索速度的机制。与突出显示目标在稀疏显示中经常无法突出显示的假设一致,我们观察到相对于密集显示,稀疏显示的搜索持续时间变化更大。反应时间分布的计算模型也支持突出显示目标在稀疏显示中无法突出显示的观点。我们的研究结果强烈质疑了经典假设,即突出显示目标的早期处理与干扰项无关。相反,干扰项的密度对刺激是否突出显示起着关键作用。这些结果呼吁采用新的、更可靠的突出显示搜索测量方法,并可能对使用相对稀疏显示的研究进行重新解释。(PsycINFO数据库记录)