Sarkiss Christopher A, Riley Kyle J, Hernandez Christopher M, Oermann Eric K, Ladner Travis R, Bederson Joshua B, Shrivastava Raj K
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jun 1;80(6):975-984. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx071.
Engagement in research and academic productivity are crucial components in the training of a neurosurgeon. This process typically begins in residency training. In this study, we analyzed individual resident productivity as it correlated to publications across all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurosurgery training programs in an attempt to identify how programs have developed and fostered a research culture and environment. We obtained a list of current neurosurgery residents in ACGME-accredited programs from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons database. An expanded PubMed and Scopus search was conducted for each resident through the present time. We tabulated all articles attributed to each resident. We then categorized the publications based on each neurosurgical subspecialty while in residency. A spreadsheet-based statistical analysis was performed. This formulated the average number of resident articles, h-indices, and most common subspecialty categories by training program. We analyzed 1352 current neurosurgery residents in 105 programs. There were a total of 10 645 publications, of which 3985 were resident first-author publications during the period of study. The most common subspecialties among all resident publications were vascular (24.9%), spine (16.9%), oncology (16.1%), pediatric (5.6%), functional (4.9%), and trauma (3.8%). The average resident published 2.9 first-author papers with average of 38.0 first-author publications by total residents at each program (range 0-241). The average h-index per resident is 2.47 ± 3.25. When comparing previously published faculty h-index program rankings against our resident h-index rankings, there is a strong correlation between the 2 datasets with a clear delineation between Top-20 productivity and that of other programs (average h-index 4.2 vs 1.7, respectively, P < .001). Increasing program size leads to a clear increase in academic productivity on both the resident and faculty level (average h-index 1.6, 1.9, 3.9 for 1, 2, and 3 resident per year programs, respectively, P < .001). Resident first-author publications correlated with recently described academic departmental productivity. Subspecialty resident publications are highest in cerebrovascular surgery. Resident research and publication is a key metric for assessing the productivity of academic neurosurgery programs and is consistent with one of the core foci of neurosurgical training.
参与研究和学术产出是神经外科医生培训的关键组成部分。这个过程通常从住院医师培训开始。在本研究中,我们分析了个体住院医师的产出与所有经研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认证的神经外科培训项目中的出版物之间的相关性,试图确定各项目是如何发展和培育研究文化及环境的。我们从美国神经外科医师协会数据库中获取了ACGME认证项目中当前神经外科住院医师的名单。通过当前时间对每位住院医师进行了扩展的PubMed和Scopus搜索。我们将所有归属于每位住院医师的文章制成表格。然后我们根据住院期间的每个神经外科亚专业对出版物进行分类。进行了基于电子表格的统计分析。这得出了每个培训项目的住院医师文章平均数量、h指数以及最常见的亚专业类别。我们分析了105个项目中的1352名当前神经外科住院医师。共有10645篇出版物,其中3985篇是研究期间住院医师作为第一作者的出版物。所有住院医师出版物中最常见的亚专业是血管(24.9%)、脊柱(16.9%)、肿瘤(16.1%)、儿科(5.6%)、功能(4.9%)和创伤(3.8%)。每位住院医师平均发表2.9篇第一作者论文,每个项目的住院医师共发表第一作者论文平均为38.0篇(范围0 - 241篇)。每位住院医师的平均h指数为2.47 ± 3.25。当将先前发表的教师h指数项目排名与我们的住院医师h指数排名进行比较时,两个数据集之间存在很强的相关性,前20名产出项目与其他项目之间有明显的区分(平均h指数分别为4.2和1.7,P < .001)。项目规模的增加导致住院医师和教师层面的学术产出明显增加(每年1名、2名和3名住院医师的项目平均h指数分别为1.6、1.9和3.9,P < .001)。住院医师作为第一作者的出版物与最近描述的学术部门产出相关。亚专业住院医师出版物在脑血管外科中最高。住院医师研究和发表是评估学术神经外科项目产出的关键指标,并且与神经外科培训的核心重点之一一致。