Stephan Blossom C M, Richardson Kathryn, Savva George M, Matthews Fiona E, Brayne Carol, Hachinski Vladimir
Newcastle University Institute of Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1756-1762. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14878. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
To determine whether the association between impaired cognition and greater risk of incident stroke is also observed when cognitive impairment is defined using different criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Prospective cohort study with 10 years of follow-up.
Large multicentre study in the United Kingdom.
Individuals (aged 64-105) from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (N = 13,004). From this, a subsample of 2,640 individuals was selected based on age, center, and cognitive ability to undergo a detailed cognitive assessment.
Information on sociodemographic characteristics, health, cognition, and functional ability was collected in an interview. The Geriatric Mental State Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination were used to determine cognitive status. Stroke incidence was derived from self-report, informant report, and death certificates. Participants were divided into no, mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment according to their baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. MCI criteria were used to classify persons into four groups: no cognitive impairment, MCI, severe impairment (i.e. other cognitive impairment no dementia: OCIND) and dementia.
Over 10 years, 703 incident strokes occurred. Lower MMSE score at baseline was associated with greater risk of incident stroke. When cognitive status was determined according to MCI criteria, those with severe impairment (odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0-2.2) and dementia (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.6-3.4) had a significantly greater risk of stroke than those with no cognitive impairment.
Criteria for MCI, defined using MMSE scores or clinical criteria, can capture individuals at greater stroke risk. The results highlight the need to focus on stroke risk in individuals even with MCI.
当使用不同的轻度认知障碍(MCI)标准定义认知障碍时,确定是否也能观察到认知功能受损与中风发病风险增加之间的关联。
一项为期10年随访的前瞻性队列研究。
英国的大型多中心研究。
医学研究委员会认知功能与衰老研究中的个体(年龄64 - 105岁,N = 13,004)。从中,根据年龄、中心和认知能力选取了2,640名个体的子样本进行详细的认知评估。
通过访谈收集社会人口学特征、健康状况、认知和功能能力方面的信息。使用老年精神状态计算机辅助分类自动老年检查和剑桥认知检查来确定认知状态。中风发病率来自自我报告、 informant报告和死亡证明。根据参与者的基线简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分,将其分为无、轻度、中度和重度认知障碍。使用MCI标准将个体分为四组:无认知障碍、MCI、重度障碍(即其他非痴呆性认知障碍:OCIND)和痴呆。
在10年期间,发生了703例中风事件。基线时较低的MMSE评分与中风发病风险增加相关。当根据MCI标准确定认知状态时,重度障碍者(比值比(OR) = 1.5,95%置信区间(CI) = 1.0 - 2.2)和痴呆患者(OR = 2.6,95% CI = 1.6 - 3.4)发生中风的风险显著高于无认知障碍者。
使用MMSE评分或临床标准定义的MCI标准能够识别出中风风险较高的个体。结果强调即使是MCI个体也需要关注中风风险。