文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

隧道建筑工人的柴油机废气暴露评估——二氧化氮、可吸入元素碳和颗粒物数量之间的关系。

Diesel Exhaust Exposure Assessment Among Tunnel Construction Workers-Correlations Between Nitrogen Dioxide, Respirable Elemental Carbon, and Particle Number.

机构信息

Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, PO Box 118, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.

Division of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, PO Box 118, Lund SE-22100, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Jun 1;61(5):539-553. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx024.


DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxx024
PMID:28371844
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Occupational exposure to diesel exhaust is common due the widespread use of diesel-powered combustion engines. Diesel exhaust is chemically complex and consists of thousands of compounds present as gases and particulate matter. Both nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and elemental carbon (EC) have been used as markers for diesel exhaust exposure. Currently EC is regarded as the best surrogate of diesel exhaust. The objective was to quantify the occupational exposure to diesel exhaust in underground tunnel construction work using a multi-metric approach, and to investigate the correlations between NO2, respirable EC, respirable organic carbon (OC), respirable total carbon (TC), respirable dust (RD), and particle number. Also, the use of NO2 as a proxy for diesel exhaust was evaluated, how much of the variability in the diesel exhaust exposure was attributed to within and between individual factors and if there was a difference between expert and self-administered measurements of NO2. METHODS: The personal exposure to diesel exhaust was assessed by expert supervised measurements of NO2, EC, OC, TC, RD and particle number in the breathing zones of underground tunnel workers. Stationary sampling of NO2, EC, OC, TC, RD, size-fractioned mass concentration, and particle number were conducted. The personal and stationary measurements were conducted on three occasions simultaneously. The workers measured their exposure by repeated self-administered measurements of NO2. The self-administered measurements were performed twice for each worker with at least one month lag between the samplings. RESULTS: In the simultaneous sampling of diesel exhaust, the geometric mean (GM) concentration of NO2 and respirable EC were 72 µg m-3 (10th-90th percentile 34-140 µg m-3) and 2.6 µg m-3 (10th-90th percentile 1.6-7.3 µg m-3), respectively. The GM for OC and TC was 28 µg m-3 (10th-90th percentile 20-42 µg m-3) and 31 µg m-3 (10th-90th percentile 20-50 µg m-3), respectively. The GM for RD and particle number was 180 µg m-3 (10th-90th percentile 20-530 µg m-3) and 47 900 cm-3 (10th-90th percentile 27500-94100 cm-3), respectively. A significant correlation was found between NO2 and respirable EC [Spearman's correlation r = 0.53 (P = 0.05)]. The within-worker variability of NO2 was 45.5% and the between-worker variability was 54.5%. The self-administered measured concentrations of NO2 (GM 70 µg m-3) did not statistically differ from the NO2 concentrations measured by an expert (P > 0.35). CONCLUSION: The diesel exhaust exposure in tunnel construction work was low. A significant correlation between NO2 and EC was observed. This indicates that NO2 could be used as a proxy for diesel exhaust in tunnel work if diesel exhaust is the only source of NO2 and if the ratio between EC and NO2 is known and constant. Passive sampling of NO2 is much easier and cheaper to perform compared with active sampling of EC. It is possible to utilize self-administered NO2 measurements in extreme and inaccessible work environments. This study adds support to continued use of NO2 as an exposure marker in combination with EC for diesel exhaust exposure. In tunnel construction work, the variability in the diesel exhaust exposure was high both between- and within-workers.

摘要

目的:由于柴油动力内燃机的广泛使用,职业性接触柴油废气较为常见。柴油废气化学成分复杂,由数千种存在于气体和颗粒物中的化合物组成。二氧化氮(NO2)和元素碳(EC)都曾被用作柴油废气暴露的标志物。目前,EC 被认为是柴油废气的最佳替代品。本研究旨在使用多指标方法量化地下隧道施工中柴油废气的职业暴露,并研究 NO2、可吸入 EC、可吸入有机碳(OC)、可吸入总碳(TC)、可吸入粉尘(RD)和颗粒数之间的相关性。此外,还评估了使用 NO2 作为柴油废气的替代物,柴油废气暴露的可变性有多少归因于个体内部和个体之间的因素,以及专家和自我管理的 NO2 测量之间是否存在差异。

方法:通过对地下隧道工人呼吸区进行专家监督的 NO2、EC、OC、TC、RD 和颗粒数测量,评估柴油废气的个人暴露情况。进行了 NO2、EC、OC、TC、RD、分级质量浓度和颗粒数的定点采样。同时在三个时间点进行个人和定点测量。工人们通过反复自我管理的 NO2 测量来测量他们的暴露情况。每个工人进行两次自我管理的测量,两次采样之间至少有一个月的时间间隔。

结果:在同时进行的柴油废气采样中,NO2 和可吸入 EC 的几何平均值(GM)浓度分别为 72µg/m3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 34-140µg/m3)和 2.6µg/m3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 1.6-7.3µg/m3)。OC 和 TC 的 GM 浓度分别为 28µg/m3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 20-42µg/m3)和 31µg/m3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 20-50µg/m3)。RD 和颗粒数的 GM 浓度分别为 180µg/m3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 20-530µg/m3)和 47900cm-3(第 10 至 90 百分位数 27500-94100cm-3)。NO2 和可吸入 EC 之间存在显著相关性(Spearman 相关系数 r=0.53,P=0.05)。NO2 的个体内变异性为 45.5%,个体间变异性为 54.5%。自我管理测量的 NO2 浓度(GM 为 70µg/m3)与专家测量的 NO2 浓度无统计学差异(P>0.35)。

结论:隧道施工中的柴油废气暴露量较低。NO2 和 EC 之间存在显著相关性。这表明,如果柴油废气是 NO2 的唯一来源,并且 EC 与 NO2 的比值已知且恒定,则可以将 NO2 用作隧道工作中柴油废气的替代物。与 EC 的主动采样相比,NO2 的被动采样更容易且更便宜。在极端和难以进入的工作环境中,可以使用自我管理的 NO2 测量。本研究为继续使用 NO2 与 EC 结合作为柴油废气暴露的标志物提供了支持。在隧道施工中,柴油废气暴露的个体内和个体间变异性均很高。

相似文献

[1]
Diesel Exhaust Exposure Assessment Among Tunnel Construction Workers-Correlations Between Nitrogen Dioxide, Respirable Elemental Carbon, and Particle Number.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2017-6-1

[2]
Exposure to particles, elemental carbon and nitrogen dioxide in workers exposed to motor exhaust.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2007-11

[3]
Elemental Carbon and Nitrogen Dioxide as Markers of Exposure to Diesel Exhaust in Selected Norwegian Industries.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2019-3-29

[4]
Underground emissions and miners' personal exposure to diesel and renewable diesel exhaust in a Swedish iron ore mine.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022-8

[5]
Exposure to Particulate Matter and Respirable Crystalline Silica in Tunnel Construction Workers Using Tunnel Boring Machines.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2023-6-6

[6]
Occupational Exposure to Respirable Dust, Respirable Crystalline Silica and Diesel Engine Exhaust Emissions in the London Tunnelling Environment.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2016-3

[7]
Exposure assessment of elemental carbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and crystalline silica at the underground excavation sites for top-down construction buildings.

PLoS One. 2020-9-14

[8]
Diesel engine exhaust exposure in underground mines: Comparison between different surrogates of particulate exposure.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018-7

[9]
Diesel exhaust exposures in port workers.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016-7

[10]
Diesel Engine Exhaust Exposure in the Ontario Civil Infrastructure Construction Industry.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2022-2-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evaluation of a self-monitoring protocol for assessing soot and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure among chimney sweeps.

Front Epidemiol. 2024-9-4

[2]
Airborne particulate matter and diesel engine exhaust on infrastructure construction sites in the Copenhagen metropolitan area.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2024-9-27

[3]
Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents among Formal and Informal Nail Technicians in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-4-11

[4]
Underground emissions and miners' personal exposure to diesel and renewable diesel exhaust in a Swedish iron ore mine.

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022-8

[5]
Development of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Ultrafine Particle Exposure: The MatPUF JEM.

Ann Work Expo Health. 2021-6-12

[6]
Exposure assessment of elemental carbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and crystalline silica at the underground excavation sites for top-down construction buildings.

PLoS One. 2020-9-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索