Desbeaux A, Gronnier C, Piessen G, Vanderbeken M, Ruolt N, Triboulet J-P, Mariette C
Univ. Lille, Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.
Univ. Lille, Ambulatory Department, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Apr 1;30(4):1-7. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow036.
Day-case esophageal surgery has been demonstrated to be safe in small prospective cohorts and only for laparoscopic fundoplication. The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility and safety of a large series of esophageal day-case surgeries, including laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), Zenker diverticulectomy (ZD), and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and to compare the outcomes among three procedures.This was a prospective, observational study of selected patients who underwent day-case LNF, ZD, and LHM between 2003 and 2013. Postoperative outcomes, the patients' satisfaction, and functional results were evaluated with dedicated scores and compared.Of the 427 patients who underwent surgery for those indications during the study period, 168 (39.3%) eligible patients underwent day-case procedures (134 LNF, 14 LHM, and 20 ZD). The overnight unplanned admission rate was 16.2% and was similar among the groups (P = 0.681). Ten patients were readmitted during the first postoperative week because of dysphagia (n = 6, all in the LNF group), flu-like syndrome (n = 1), and secondary perforation (n = 3, all in the LHM group). The unplanned seven-day readmission rate was significantly higher in the LHM group than in the ZD and LNF groups (P = 0.042). The 30-day rates of unplanned readmission and consultation were 8.9% (P = 0.300) and 4.8%, respectively. At follow-up, 87.5% of the patients were satisfied with day-case treatment, and the functional results were good for 81.4% of the patients.Day-case esophageal surgery is feasible for LNF and seems to be feasible for ZD. Safety criteria have not yet been met for LHM, requiring further adaptations.
日间食管手术已被证明在小型前瞻性队列研究中是安全的,且仅适用于腹腔镜胃底折叠术。本研究的目的是评估一系列大型食管日间手术的可行性和安全性,包括腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术(LNF)、Zenker憩室切除术(ZD)和腹腔镜海勒肌切开术(LHM),并比较这三种手术的结果。
这是一项对2003年至2013年间接受日间LNF、ZD和LHM手术的选定患者进行的前瞻性观察研究。通过专用评分评估术后结果、患者满意度和功能结果并进行比较。
在研究期间因这些适应症接受手术的427例患者中,168例(39.3%)符合条件的患者接受了日间手术(134例LNF、14例LHM和20例ZD)。过夜非计划入院率为16.2%,各组之间相似(P = 0.681)。术后第一周有10例患者因吞咽困难(n = 6,均在LNF组)、流感样综合征(n = 1)和继发性穿孔(n = 3,均在LHM组)再次入院。LHM组的非计划七天再入院率显著高于ZD组和LNF组(P = 0.042)。非计划再入院率和会诊率的30天率分别为8.9%(P = 0.300)和4.8%。随访时,87.5%的患者对日间治疗满意,81.4%的患者功能结果良好。
日间食管手术对LNF是可行的,对ZD似乎也是可行的。LHM尚未达到安全标准,需要进一步调整。