Chabirand Aude, Loiseau Marianne, Renaudin Isabelle, Poliakoff Françoise
Unit for Tropical Pests and Diseases, Plant Health Laboratory (LSV), French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Saint-Pierre, Reunion Island, France.
Plant Health Laboratory (LSV), French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Angers, France.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0175247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175247. eCollection 2017.
A working group established in the framework of the EUPHRESCO European collaborative project aimed to compare and validate diagnostic protocols for the detection of "Flavescence dorée" (FD) phytoplasma in grapevines. Seven molecular protocols were compared in an interlaboratory test performance study where each laboratory had to analyze the same panel of samples consisting of DNA extracts prepared by the organizing laboratory. The tested molecular methods consisted of universal and group-specific real-time and end-point nested PCR tests. Different statistical approaches were applied to this collaborative study. Firstly, there was the standard statistical approach consisting in analyzing samples which are known to be positive and samples which are known to be negative and reporting the proportion of false-positive and false-negative results to respectively calculate diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. This approach was supplemented by the calculation of repeatability and reproducibility for qualitative methods based on the notions of accordance and concordance. Other new approaches were also implemented, based, on the one hand, on the probability of detection model, and, on the other hand, on Bayes' theorem. These various statistical approaches are complementary and give consistent results. Their combination, and in particular, the introduction of new statistical approaches give overall information on the performance and limitations of the different methods, and are particularly useful for selecting the most appropriate detection scheme with regards to the prevalence of the pathogen. Three real-time PCR protocols (methods M4, M5 and M6 respectively developed by Hren (2007), Pelletier (2009) and under patent oligonucleotides) achieved the highest levels of performance for FD phytoplasma detection. This paper also addresses the issue of indeterminate results and the identification of outlier results. The statistical tools presented in this paper and their combination can be applied to many other studies concerning plant pathogens and other disciplines that use qualitative detection methods.
在欧洲植物健康研究合作项目(EUPHRESCO)框架下成立的一个工作组,旨在比较和验证用于检测葡萄藤中“黄化病”(FD)植原体的诊断方案。在一项实验室间测试性能研究中,对七种分子方案进行了比较,每个实验室都必须分析由组织实验室制备的相同样本组DNA提取物。所测试的分子方法包括通用和组特异性实时及终点巢式PCR检测。对这项合作研究应用了不同的统计方法。首先是标准统计方法,即分析已知为阳性和已知为阴性的样本,并报告假阳性和假阴性结果的比例,分别计算诊断特异性和敏感性。基于一致性和协调性的概念,通过计算定性方法的重复性和再现性对该方法进行了补充。还实施了其他新方法,一方面基于检测概率模型,另一方面基于贝叶斯定理。这些不同的统计方法是互补的,并且给出了一致的结果。它们的结合,特别是新统计方法的引入,给出了不同方法性能和局限性的总体信息,对于根据病原体的流行情况选择最合适的检测方案特别有用。三种实时PCR方案(分别由赫伦(2007年)、佩尔蒂埃(2009年)开发的方法M4、M5以及专利寡核苷酸方法M6)在FD植原体检测方面达到了最高性能水平。本文还讨论了不确定结果的问题以及异常结果的识别。本文介绍的统计工具及其组合可应用于许多其他有关植物病原体以及使用定性检测方法的其他学科的研究。