• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体定位实践的调查。

Danish survey of acetabular component positioning practice during primary total hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Cotong Dana, Troelsen Anders, Husted Henrik, Gromov Kirill

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).

PMID:28385170
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Lewinnek and Callanan "safe zones" have been widely used to minimise the dislocation fre-quency in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but recent studies have questioned the association between "safe zones" and lower dislocation rates. The purpose of this study was to investigate: 1) if hip surgeons agree on a specific "safe zone" for cup positioning and 2) surgeons' surgical practice patterns regarding recurring instability in primary THA.

METHODS

A survey was performed among hip surgeons during the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Danish Orthopaedic Society. The survey contained questions on optimal component positioning, surgical practice patterns in primary THA, indications and surgical techniques used in revision THA.

RESULTS

A total of 42 questionnaires were collected, two were excluded, leaving 40 for analyses. 97% of the surgeons reported an optimum cup anteversion within the Lewinnek and Callanan "safe zones", whereas 97% and 83% reported optimum cup inclination within the Lewinnek and Callanan "safe zones", respectively. The reported range for optimal cup positioning varied from 30-55 degrees of inclination and 15-30 degrees of anteversion. The minimum and max-imum accepted cup inclination and anteversion within the Lewinnek "safe zone" was 68% and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip surgeons agree that optimum cup po-sitioning should lie within the Lewinnek "safe zone", but they do not agree on the exact optimal cup positioning with respect to inclination and anteversion. This is in accordance with current evidence that strict usage of the Lewinnek "safe zone" cannot be justified.

FUNDING

none.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not relevant.

摘要

引言

Lewinnek和Callanan的“安全区”已被广泛用于降低全髋关节置换术(THA)的脱位频率,但最近的研究对“安全区”与较低脱位率之间的关联提出了质疑。本研究的目的是调查:1)髋关节外科医生对于髋臼杯定位的特定“安全区”是否达成共识;2)外科医生在初次THA中处理反复出现的不稳定情况的手术实践模式。

方法

在丹麦骨科协会2015年年会期间对髋关节外科医生进行了一项调查。该调查包含有关最佳假体组件定位、初次THA的手术实践模式、翻修THA的适应症和使用的手术技术等问题。

结果

共收集到42份问卷,排除2份,剩余40份用于分析。97%的外科医生报告髋臼杯前倾角在Lewinnek和Callanan的“安全区”内,而分别有97%和83%的外科医生报告髋臼杯倾斜角在Lewinnek和Callanan的“安全区”内。报告的最佳髋臼杯定位范围为倾斜角30 - 55度,前倾角15 - 30度。在Lewinnek“安全区”内,髋臼杯倾斜角和前倾角的最小和最大可接受范围分别为68%和67%。

结论

髋关节外科医生一致认为最佳髋臼杯定位应在Lewinnek“安全区”内,但在倾斜角和前倾角的确切最佳定位上未达成共识。这与当前的证据一致,即严格使用Lewinnek“安全区”是不合理的。

资金来源

无。

试验注册

不相关。

相似文献

1
Danish survey of acetabular component positioning practice during primary total hip arthroplasty.丹麦初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体定位实践的调查。
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
2
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.什么安全区?绝大多数脱位的全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼组件位置处于Lewinnek安全区内。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5.
3
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
4
Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.机器人辅助与传统髋臼杯置入在全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项配对对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
5
Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?全髋关节置换术中机器人引导与透视引导的应用:在学习曲线中髋臼位置是否得到改善?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Is the alignment guide technique in total hip arthroplasty sufficient for accurate cup positioning with a modified Watson Jones approach?在全髋关节置换术中,使用改良的沃森·琼斯入路时,对线引导技术对于髋臼杯的精确放置是否足够?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018806645. doi: 10.1177/2309499018806645.
7
Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置与脱位风险
Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.原发性骨关节炎全髋关节置换术中采用推荐的安全组件方向与固有解剖结构的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01014.
9
Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.能否定义一个比Lewinnek安全区更安全的目标区域来预防全髋关节置换术的不稳定?对56例髋关节置换术后脱位患者和93例匹配对照进行病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?对于使用后外侧入路的右利手外科医生进行双侧全髋关节置换时,髋臼杯的方向是否存在差异?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 23;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Does cup position differ between trabecular metal and titanium cups? A radiographic propensity score matched study of 300 hips.特贝尓克金属杯与钛质杯的臼杯位置是否存在差异?300 髋的放射倾向评分匹配研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):682-686. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1788290. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
2
Radiographic cup position following posterior and lateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. An explorative randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术后后路和外侧入路的影像学髋臼位置。一项探索性随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):e0191401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191401. eCollection 2018.