Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-000, Brazil.
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, 37200-000, Brazil.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4565-4573. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12129. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 systems for covering corn silage in bunker silos. The first system consisted of a sheet of 45-μm-thick oxygen barrier film (OB, polyethylene + ethylene-vinyl alcohol) placed along the length of the sidewall before filling. After filling, the excess film was pulled over the wall on top of the silage, and a sheet of polyethylene was placed on top. The second system involved using a standard sheet (ST) of 180-μm-thick polyethylene film. Eight commercial bunker silos were divided into 2 parts lengthwise so that one-half of the silo was covered with OB and the other half with a ST system. During the filling, 3 net bags with chopped corn were buried in the central part (halfway between the top and bottom of the silo) of the bunkers (CCOR) in 3 sections 10 m apart. After filling, 18 net bags (9 per covering system) were buried 40 cm below the top surface of the 3 sections. These bags were placed at 3 distances from the bunker walls (0 to 50 cm, 51 to 100 cm, and 101 to 150 cm). During unloading, the bags were removed from the silos to determine the dry matter (DM) losses, fermentation end products, and nutritive value. The Milk2006 spreadsheet was used to estimate milk per tonne of DM. The model included the fixed effect of treatment (7 different locations in the bunker) and the random effect of the silo. Two contrasts were tested to compare silages in the top laterals (shoulders) with that in the CCOR (CCOR vs. OB and CCOR vs. ST). Three contrasts compared the corresponding distances of the silage covered by the 2 systems (OB50 vs. ST50, OB100 vs. ST100 and OB150 vs. ST150). Variables were analyzed with the PROC MIXED procedure of the SAS at the 5% level. The OB method produced well-fermented silages, which were similar to CCOR, whereas the OB system showed less lactic acid and greater pH and mold counts compared with CCOR. The ST method had 116.2 kg of milk/t less than the CCOR, as the OB system and the CCOR were similar (1,258.3 and 1,294.0 kg/t, respectively). Regarding the distances from the walls, the effects were more pronounced from 0 to 101 cm. The OB50 and OB100 silages had better quality and lower mold counts and DM losses than ST50 and ST100. The OB system reduced DM and nutrient losses at the shoulders in farm bunker corn silages compared with no sidewall plastic. The OB film should lap onto the crop for at least 200 cm so that 150 cm are covered outward from the wall.
本研究旨在评估两种覆盖青贮饲料的系统,一种是在填充前沿青贮饲料仓侧壁铺设一层 45-μm 厚的氧气阻隔膜(OB,聚乙烯+乙烯-乙烯醇);另一种是使用标准的 180-μm 厚聚乙烯薄膜。8 个商业青贮饲料仓被纵向分成两部分,使一半的青贮饲料仓用 OB 覆盖,另一半用 ST 系统覆盖。在填充过程中,将 3 个装有切碎玉米的网袋埋在仓中央(距离仓顶和仓底的一半),3 个网袋之间相隔 10 米。填充后,将 18 个网袋(每个覆盖系统 9 个)埋在距离 3 个部分顶部表面 40cm 以下的位置。这些袋子被放置在距离青贮饲料仓壁 0 到 50cm、51 到 100cm 和 101 到 150cm 处的 3 个不同位置。在卸载过程中,将袋子从青贮饲料仓中取出,以确定干物质(DM)损失、发酵终产物和营养价值。使用 Milk2006 电子表格来估算每吨 DM 的牛奶产量。该模型包括处理(青贮饲料仓内的 7 个不同位置)的固定效应和青贮饲料仓的随机效应。测试了两个对比来比较青贮饲料仓顶部(肩部)和 CCOR(CCOR 与 OB 和 CCOR 与 ST)之间的青贮饲料。三个对比比较了两个系统覆盖的青贮饲料的相应距离(OB50 与 ST50、OB100 与 ST100 和 OB150 与 ST150)。采用 SAS 的 PROC MIXED 程序在 5%的水平上分析变量。OB 方法产生了发酵良好的青贮饲料,与 CCOR 相似,而 OB 系统的乳酸含量较低,pH 值和霉菌数量较高。ST 方法的牛奶产量比 CCOR 少 116.2kg/t,而 OB 系统与 CCOR 相似(分别为 1258.3kg/t 和 1294.0kg/t)。关于距离墙壁的影响,0 到 101cm 之间的影响更为明显。OB50 和 OB100 青贮饲料的质量较好,霉菌数量和 DM 损失较低,而 ST50 和 ST100 则较低。OB 系统减少了农场青贮饲料仓青贮饲料肩部的 DM 和养分损失,而没有侧壁塑料。OB 薄膜应至少覆盖到作物的 200cm 处,以便从墙壁向外覆盖 150cm。