Maciąg Aleksander, Farkowski Michał, Ciszewski Jan, Pytkowski Mariusz, Szwed Hanna
2nd Department of Coronary Artery Disease, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(7):641-644. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0069. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Some electrophysiological techniques, such as balloon cryoablation, involve the use of steerable sheaths of large diameter (outer diameter 15 Fr or more). Their introduction to the femoral vein may be difficult, especially in patients who have had numerous venipunctures in this area.
The authors describe a modification of typical venous access with the use of a "buddy wire" technique, facilitating the insertion of the cryoablation sheaths to the femoral vein.
A case-control study. The study involved a retrospective analysis of 27 consecutive procedures of balloon cryoablation of pulmonary veins performed in 2015 by the first author, compared to 23 consecutive procedures of balloon cryoablation performed in 2014 without a "buddy wire" technique. The study and control groups did not vary significantly. There were 11 women in both groups. The average age of the patients was 55.9 years. The "buddy wire" technique was the only difference in procedure performance between the control and study groups. In the study group a short introducer was inserted through a puncture of the right femoral vein, and then two wires were introduced through it. One of them was secured, so that it could not move, while the other served as a typical trans-septal puncture monitored with the use of X-ray. The standard trans-septal sheet was replaced with a 15 Fr steerable sheath, inserted through the same puncture site next to the secured "buddy wire". The short wire was then removed from the femoral vein. Typical balloon cryoablation of pulmonary veins was performed. After the end of the procedure, the puncture site was secured with a haemostatic suture for 12-18 h.
Femoral access with a 15 Fr steerable sheath and cryoablation were safely performed in all patients in the study group and in 22 out of 23 in the control group (100% vs. 95.6%, p = NS). Pulmonary vein isolation in one patient was performed using another technique. No damage to steerable sheaths was observed. There were no vascular complications requiring extended hospitalisation, blood transfusion, or surgical interventions in either group. The "door-to-door" time of the procedures ranged from 2 h 32 min on average in the study group to 2 h 43 min on average in the control group (p = NS). There was significant reduction in fluoroscopy time: 7 min 15 s on average from 11 min 25 s (p = 0.0009).
The use of the "buddy wire" technique may lead to significant reduction in fluoroscopy time during cryoablation of pulmonary veins by facilitating the insertion of the steerable sheaths to the femoral vein.
一些电生理技术,如球囊冷冻消融术,需要使用大直径(外径15F或更大)的可操纵鞘管。将其插入股静脉可能会有困难,尤其是在该区域进行过多次静脉穿刺的患者中。
作者描述了一种使用“伙伴导丝”技术对典型静脉通路进行的改良方法,以促进冷冻消融鞘管插入股静脉。
一项病例对照研究。该研究对第一作者在2015年连续进行的27例肺静脉球囊冷冻消融术进行回顾性分析,并与2014年连续进行的23例未使用“伙伴导丝”技术的肺静脉球囊冷冻消融术进行对比。研究组和对照组之间没有显著差异。两组均有11名女性。患者的平均年龄为55.9岁。“伙伴导丝”技术是对照组和研究组手术操作中唯一的不同之处。在研究组中,通过右股静脉穿刺插入一根短引导鞘,然后通过它引入两根导丝。其中一根固定住,使其不能移动,而另一根用作典型的经房间隔穿刺,并在X线监测下进行。将标准的经房间隔鞘管换成一根15F的可操纵鞘管,通过固定的“伙伴导丝”旁边的同一穿刺部位插入。然后将短导丝从股静脉中取出。进行典型的肺静脉球囊冷冻消融术。手术结束后,穿刺部位用止血缝线固定12 - 18小时。
研究组所有患者以及对照组23例中的22例(100%对95.6%,p = 无统计学意义)均安全地完成了使用15F可操纵鞘管的股静脉穿刺及冷冻消融术。1例患者使用另一种技术进行了肺静脉隔离。未观察到可操纵鞘管受损。两组均未出现需要延长住院时间、输血或手术干预的血管并发症。手术的“门到门”时间平均在研究组为2小时32分钟,在对照组为2小时43分钟(p = 无统计学意义)。透视时间显著缩短:从平均11分25秒降至7分15秒(p = 0.0009)。
使用“伙伴导丝”技术可通过促进可操纵鞘管插入股静脉,显著缩短肺静脉冷冻消融术中的透视时间。