Outcome of endometrial cancer after lymphadenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis with long-lasting follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer is unclear. Our objective is to assess the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The study reviewed retrospectively 829 cases of endometrial cancer from a single non-oncological center from 1981 to 2014. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Independent variables were: 2009 FIGO stage, histological type of endometrial cancer (non-endometrioid, endometrioid, grading 1, 2 and 3), radicality on parametria, lymphatic dissection (any kind) (yes/no), any kind of chemotherapy, any kind of radiotherapy, brachytherapy, patients' age. Dependent variable was death for endometrial cancer and first relapse. Time variable was the semester of follow-up. P value for significance was set <0.05.

RESULTS

Many data about the extension of node dissection were missing. Pelvic node dissection or sampling seem the more common procedure performed. At the 10-semester of follow-up, at the 20-semester of follow-up and at the 30 semester of follow up, lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival at a p value of less than 0.05. Lymphadenectomy reduces the risk of relapse at the 10 semester and 20-semester of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy plays a role in preventing relapses but it is not proved that non-aggressive lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer improves overall survival at p level of 0.05. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that a very small improvement in long lasting survival in few cases of endometrial cancer could be due to node dissections.