Zoch Beate, Günther Annette, Karch André, Mikolajczyk Rafael
From the *ESME - Epidemiological and Statistical Methods Research Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany; †PhD Programme "Epidemiology," Braunschweig-Hannover, Germany; ‡German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Hannover-Braunschweig site, Braunschweig, Germany; §Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany; and ¶Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometry, and Informatics (IMEBI), Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Oct;36(10):956-961. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001604.
Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are among the most frequent childhood diseases in Western countries. Assessment of ARI episodes for research purposes is usually based on parent-administered retrospective questionnaires or prospective symptom diaries. The aim of our analysis was to compare the effect of ARI definitions on the corresponding disease burden in a prospective cohort study using symptom diaries.
A literature search was performed to identify definitions of ARI used in research studies. The definitions were applied to a symptom diary dataset from a cohort study of 1-3-year-old children conducted in the winter season 2013/2014. We compared the total number of ARI episodes, the total number of days with ARI and the median and mean duration of ARI episodes resulting from the use of the different definitions.
Six ARI definitions were identified in the literature. Depending on ARI definition, the total number of ARI episodes and the total number of days with ARI in our dataset varied by a factor of 1.69 and 1.53, respectively, between the lowest and the highest. The median duration of the episodes ranged from 7 to 10 days.
Different definitions led to considerable differences in the number and duration of ARI episodes, making direct comparisons of studies with different methods questionable. We propose the use of a standardized ARI definition in upcoming cohort studies working with diary data. This process could be conducted using a Delphi survey with experts in this study field.
急性呼吸道感染(ARIs)是西方国家最常见的儿童疾病之一。出于研究目的对ARI发作的评估通常基于家长填写的回顾性问卷或前瞻性症状日记。我们分析的目的是在一项使用症状日记的前瞻性队列研究中比较ARI定义对相应疾病负担的影响。
进行文献检索以确定研究中使用的ARI定义。将这些定义应用于2013/2014年冬季对1至3岁儿童进行的队列研究的症状日记数据集。我们比较了使用不同定义得出的ARI发作总数、患ARI的总天数以及ARI发作的中位数和平均持续时间。
在文献中确定了六种ARI定义。根据ARI定义,我们数据集中ARI发作的总数和患ARI的总天数在最低值和最高值之间分别相差1.69倍和1.53倍。发作的中位数持续时间为7至10天。
不同的定义导致ARI发作的数量和持续时间存在相当大的差异,使得对采用不同方法的研究进行直接比较存在疑问。我们建议在即将开展的使用日记数据的队列研究中使用标准化的ARI定义。这个过程可以通过对该研究领域的专家进行德尔菲调查来进行。