Clinical Trials Unit, Neurovascular Surgery Program, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Brain Injury Outcomes, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1;81(5):860-866. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx123.
Minimally invasive thrombolytic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma is being investigated in the ongoing phase III clinical trial of Minimally Invasive Surgery plus recombinant Tissue plasminogen activator for Intracerebral hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE III).
To assess the accuracy of catheter placement and efficacy of hematoma evacuation in relation to surgical approach and surgeon experience.
We performed a trial midpoint interim assessment of 123 cases that underwent the surgical procedure. Accuracy of catheter placement was prospectively assessed by the trial Surgical Center based on prearticulated criteria. Hematoma evacuation efficacy was evaluated based on absolute volume reduction, percentage hematoma evacuation, and reaching the target end-of-treatment volume of <15 mL. One of 3 surgical trajectories was used: anterior (A), posterior (B), and lobar (C). Surgeons were classified based on experience with the MISTIE procedure as prequalified, qualified with probation, and fully qualified.
The average hematoma volume was 49.7 mL (range 20.0-124), and the mean evacuation rate was 71% (range 18.4%-99.8%). First placed catheters were 58% in good position, 28% suboptimal (but suitable to dose), and 14% poor (requiring repositioning). Posterior trajectory (B) was associated with significantly higher rates of poor placement (35%, P = .01). There was no significant difference in catheter placement accuracy among surgeons of varying experience. Hematoma evacuation efficacy was not significantly different among the 3 surgical approaches or different surgeons' experience.
Ongoing surgical education and quality monitoring in MISTIE III have resulted in consistent rates of hematoma evacuation despite technical challenges with the surgical approaches and among surgeons of varying experience.
在正在进行的 III 期临床试验——《微创加重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗脑出血清除术(MISTIE III)》中,正在研究微创血肿清除术。
评估导管放置的准确性和血肿清除的效果与手术方法和外科医生经验的关系。
我们对 123 例接受手术的患者进行了试验中期评估。根据预先制定的标准,试验手术中心对导管放置的准确性进行了前瞻性评估。根据绝对体积减少、血肿清除百分比和达到治疗结束时<15mL 的目标终末体积来评估血肿清除效果。使用了 3 种手术轨迹中的 1 种:前(A)、后(B)和叶(C)。根据他们在 MISTIE 手术中的经验,外科医生分为有资格、有资格但需试用和完全有资格。
平均血肿量为 49.7mL(范围 20.0-124),平均清除率为 71%(范围 18.4%-99.8%)。首次放置的导管有 58%处于良好位置,28%为次优(但适合剂量),14%为不佳(需要重新定位)。后轨迹(B)与较差的放置位置(35%)显著相关(P=0.01)。经验不同的外科医生之间导管放置的准确性没有显著差异。在 3 种手术方法或不同经验的外科医生中,血肿清除效果没有显著差异。
尽管手术方法存在技术挑战,而且外科医生经验不同,但在 MISTIE III 中持续的手术教育和质量监测导致血肿清除率保持一致。