El-Dosouky I
Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec 1;17(suppl_2):ii227-ii234. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew262.001.
Mitral valve resistance (MVR) is a hemodynamic consequence of mitral stenosis but it has no clear threshold and it has a shortage of data to be reliable.
is to investigate match and mismatch between opening area and resistance especially in patients with moderate and mild mitral stenosis.
This cross section case control study comprised 88 patients with moderate and mild rheumatic mitral stenosis. Transthorathic echocardiographic study estimated: mitral valve area (MVA) both by planimerty (2D) and pressure half time (PHT), mitral valve score (MVS), mean transmitral pressure gradient (MPG), diastolic filling time(DFT), left ventricular out flow tract diameter (LVOTd) and velocity time integral (LVOT vti) , the MVR was calculated as: MPG/aortic flow ratio [(LVOTd) (LVOTvti)/ DFT] in dynes.sec.cm5, NYHA function class of all patients was estimated. We classified our patients into 2 groups, group 1 (51 patients) with matched MVR and group 2 (37 patients) with unmatched MVR (unexpected high MVR in relation to valve area).
Patients with moderate mitral stenosis have MVR less than 105 dynes.sec/cm5, while patient with mild mitral stenosis have MVR less than 76 dynes.sec/cm5 this is in the matched group, but there are patients with unmatched higher MVR. Group 2 compared to group 1; had higher NYHA function class (1.4±0.6 vs. 1.2±0.4, P < 0.05), MVS (8.1±1.8 vs 7±0.9, P < 0.05), MPG (11,3±3.7 vs.7.8±2.5 mmHg, P < 0.01) and higher MVR (122.37±29.87 vs. 67.18±20.12 dynes.sec/cm5 , P < 0.01), MVR showed positive correlation with MVS (r=0.5, P < 0.05), Step wise logistic regression analysis showed that MVS is the only independent predictor of the MVR severity in the mismatched (unexpected high) group , so the higher the MVS the higher the expected MVR whatever the MVA is ; (B±SE=6.997±2.826, t=2.476, 95% CI 1.241±12.752 with an odds ratio=0.412, P < 0.05).
It would make much more sense to investigate match and mismatch between opening area and resistance in rheumatic mitral stenosis, the only independent predictor of mismatch is the mitral valve score.
二尖瓣阻力(MVR)是二尖瓣狭窄的血流动力学结果,但它没有明确的阈值,且缺乏可靠的数据。
研究开口面积与阻力之间的匹配和不匹配情况,尤其是在中度和轻度二尖瓣狭窄患者中。
这项横断面病例对照研究纳入了88例中度和轻度风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者。经胸超声心动图检查评估:通过平面测量法(二维)和压力减半时间(PHT)评估二尖瓣面积(MVA)、二尖瓣评分(MVS)、平均跨二尖瓣压力梯度(MPG)、舒张期充盈时间(DFT)、左心室流出道直径(LVOTd)和速度时间积分(LVOT vti),MVR计算为:MPG/主动脉血流比[(LVOTd)(LVOTvti)/DFT],单位为达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵,评估所有患者的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级。我们将患者分为两组,第1组(51例患者)MVR匹配,第2组(37例患者)MVR不匹配(相对于瓣膜面积,MVR意外升高)。
在匹配组中,中度二尖瓣狭窄患者的MVR小于105达因·秒/厘米⁵,轻度二尖瓣狭窄患者的MVR小于76达因·秒/厘米⁵,但存在MVR较高的不匹配患者。与第1组相比,第2组的NYHA功能分级更高(1.4±0.6对1.2±0.4,P<0.05)、MVS更高(8.1±1.8对7±0.9,P<0.05)、MPG更高(11.3±3.7对7.8±2.5 mmHg,P<0.01)且MVR更高(122.37±29.87对67.18±20.12达因·秒/厘米⁵,P<0.01),MVR与MVS呈正相关(r=0.5,P<0.05)。逐步逻辑回归分析表明,MVS是不匹配(意外升高)组中MVR严重程度的唯一独立预测因素,因此无论MVA如何,MVS越高,预期的MVR越高;(B±SE=6.997±2.826,t=2.476,95%可信区间1.241±12.752,优势比=0.412,P<0.05)。
研究风湿性二尖瓣狭窄中开口面积与阻力之间的匹配和不匹配情况更有意义,不匹配的唯一独立预测因素是二尖瓣评分。