Lee Hyeseon, Park Young-Mi, We Yu-Mee, Han Duck Jong, Seo Jung-Woo, Moon Haena, Lee Yu-Ho, Kim Yang-Gyun, Moon Ju-Young, Lee Sang-Ho, Lee Jong-Keuk
Asan Institute for Life Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Genomics Inform. 2017 Mar;15(1):2-10. doi: 10.5808/GI.2017.15.1.2. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Early detection and proper management of kidney rejection are crucial for the long-term health of a transplant recipient. Recipients are normally monitored by serum creatinine measurement and sometimes with graft biopsies. Donor-derived cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) in the recipient's plasma and/or urine may be a better indicator of acute rejection. We evaluated digital PCR (dPCR) as a system for monitoring graft status using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based detection of donor DNA in plasma or urine. We compared the detection abilities of the QX200, RainDrop, and QuantStudio 3D dPCR systems. The QX200 was the most accurate and sensitive. Plasma and/or urine samples were isolated from 34 kidney recipients at multiple time points after transplantation, and analyzed by dPCR using the QX200. We found that donor DNA was almost undetectable in plasma DNA samples, whereas a high percentage of donor DNA was measured in urine DNA samples, indicating that urine is a good source of cfDNA for patient monitoring. We found that at least 24% of the highly polymorphic SNPs used to identify individuals could also identify donor cfDNA in transplant patient samples. Our results further showed that autosomal, sex-specific, and mitochondrial SNPs were suitable markers for identifying donor cfDNA. Finally, we found that donor-derived cfDNA measurement by dPCR was not sufficient to predict a patient's clinical condition. Our results indicate that donor-derived cfDNA is not an accurate predictor of kidney status in kidney transplant patients.
早期检测和妥善处理肾移植排斥反应对于移植受者的长期健康至关重要。通常通过血清肌酐测量对受者进行监测,有时也会进行移植肾活检。受者血浆和/或尿液中供体来源的游离脱氧核糖核酸(cfDNA)可能是急性排斥反应的更好指标。我们评估了数字PCR(dPCR)作为一种利用基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)检测血浆或尿液中供体DNA来监测移植肾状态的系统。我们比较了QX200、RainDrop和QuantStudio 3D dPCR系统的检测能力。QX200最为准确和灵敏。在移植后的多个时间点从34名肾移植受者中采集血浆和/或尿液样本,并使用QX200通过dPCR进行分析。我们发现血浆DNA样本中几乎检测不到供体DNA,而尿液DNA样本中检测到的供体DNA比例很高,这表明尿液是用于患者监测的cfDNA的良好来源。我们发现,用于识别个体的高度多态性SNP中至少有24%也能够识别移植患者样本中的供体cfDNA。我们的结果进一步表明,常染色体、性别特异性和线粒体SNP是识别供体cfDNA的合适标记。最后,我们发现通过dPCR测量供体来源的cfDNA不足以预测患者的临床状况。我们的结果表明,供体来源的cfDNA不是肾移植患者肾状态的准确预测指标。