Lai Jennifer C, Covinsky Kenneth E, Dodge Jennifer L, Boscardin W John, Segev Dorry L, Roberts John P, Feng Sandy
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):564-574. doi: 10.1002/hep.29219. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Cirrhosis is characterized by muscle wasting, malnutrition, and functional decline that confer excess mortality not well quantified by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Sodium (MELDNa) score. We aimed to develop a frailty index to capture these extrahepatic complications of cirrhosis and enhance mortality prediction in patients with cirrhosis. Consecutive outpatients listed for liver transplantation at a single transplant center without MELD exceptions were assessed with candidate frailty measures. Best subset selection analyses with Cox regression identified subsets of frailty measures that predicted waitlist mortality (=death or delisting because of sickness). We selected the frailty index by balancing statistical accuracy with clinical utility. The net reclassification index (NRI) evaluated the %patients correctly reclassified by adding the frailty index to MELDNa. Included were 536 patients with cirrhosis with median MELDNa of 18. One hundred seven (20%) died/were delisted. The final frailty index consisted of: grip strength, chair stands, and balance. The ability of MELDNa and the frailty index to correctly rank patients according to their 3-month waitlist mortality risk (i.e., concordance-statistic) was 0.80 and 0.76, respectively, but 0.82 for MELDNa+frailty index together. Compared with MELDNa alone, MELDNa+frailty index correctly reclassified 16% of deaths/delistings (P = 0.005) and 3% of nondeaths/delistings (P = 0.17) with a total NRI of 19% (P < 0.001). Compared to those with robust frailty index scores (<20th percentile), cirrhotics with poor frailty index scores (>80th percentile) were more impaired by gait speed, difficulty with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, exhaustion, and low physical activity (P < 0.001 for each).
Our frailty index for patients with cirrhosis, comprised of three performance-based metrics, has construct validity for the concept of frailty and improves risk prediction of waitlist mortality over MELDNa alone. (Hepatology 2017;66:564-574).
肝硬化的特征为肌肉萎缩、营养不良和功能衰退,这些因素导致的额外死亡率无法通过终末期肝病模型(MELD)钠评分(MELDNa)进行准确量化。我们旨在开发一种虚弱指数,以捕捉肝硬化的这些肝外并发症,并提高肝硬化患者的死亡率预测能力。在一个单一移植中心,对连续列出等待肝移植且无MELD例外情况的门诊患者,使用候选虚弱测量指标进行评估。通过Cox回归进行的最佳子集选择分析确定了预测等待名单死亡率(因疾病死亡或退出名单)的虚弱测量指标子集。我们通过平衡统计准确性和临床实用性来选择虚弱指数。净重新分类指数(NRI)评估了通过将虚弱指数添加到MELDNa中而正确重新分类的患者百分比。纳入了536例肝硬化患者,MELDNa中位数为18。107例(20%)死亡或退出名单。最终的虚弱指数包括握力、从椅子上站起和平衡能力。MELDNa和虚弱指数根据患者3个月等待名单死亡风险正确排序患者的能力(即一致性统计量)分别为0.80和0.76,但MELDNa + 虚弱指数共同为0.82。与单独使用MELDNa相比,MELDNa + 虚弱指数正确重新分类了16%的死亡/退出名单(P = 0.005)和3%的非死亡/退出名单(P = 0.17),总NRI为19%(P < 0.001)。与虚弱指数得分稳健(<第20百分位数)的患者相比,虚弱指数得分较差(>第80百分位数)的肝硬化患者在步态速度、工具性日常生活活动困难、疲劳和低体力活动方面受损更严重(每项P < 0.001)。
我们为肝硬化患者开发的虚弱指数由三个基于表现的指标组成,对虚弱概念具有结构效度,并且与单独使用MELDNa相比,改善了等待名单死亡率的风险预测。(《肝脏病学》2017年;66:564 - 574)