Suppr超能文献

手术联合不同辅助治疗在食管癌治疗中的预后:一项网状Meta分析

Prognosis of surgery combined with different adjuvant therapies in esophageal cancer treatment: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Shenglei, Liu Hongtao, Diao Changying, Wang Xiaohui, Gao Ming, Li Zongming, Song Lijie, Gao Xianzheng, Han Jing, Wang Feng, Li Wencai, Han Xinwei

机构信息

Department of Pathology, The First Affliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 50000, China.

Laboratory for Cell Biology, College of Life Sciences of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):36339-36353. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16193.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This network meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether the efficacy of surgery with adjuvant therapies, including radiotherapy (RT+S), chemotherapy (CT+S), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT+S) have better performance in esophageal cancer treatment and management. PubMed and EMBASE were used to search for relevant trials. Both conventional pair-wise and network meta-analyses were carried out. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank interventions based on the efficacy of the treatment method. As for 3-year overall survival (OS), CRT+S showed the highest efficacy (CRT+S vs.

SURGERY

HR=0.81, 95% CrI =0.73-0.90; CRT+S vs. CT+S: HR=0.82, 95% CrI =0.70-0.95; CRT+S vs. RT+S: HR=0.77, 95% CrI =0.62-0.95). For disease-free survival, CRT+S showed efficacy over CT+S ((HR =0.70, 95% CrI =0. 59-0.83). In conclusion, CRT+S showed a better performance for survival outcomes and ranks best among all therapies. The results of our study can provide guidance for medical decisions and treatment options that may help clinical practitioners improve the efficacy of EC treatment.

摘要

未标注

进行这项网状Meta分析是为了评估手术联合辅助治疗(包括放疗(RT+S)、化疗(CT+S)和放化疗(CRT+S))在食管癌治疗与管理中是否具有更好的效果。使用PubMed和EMBASE检索相关试验。同时进行了传统的成对Meta分析和网状Meta分析。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)用于根据治疗方法的疗效对干预措施进行排序。至于3年总生存期(OS),CRT+S显示出最高的疗效(CRT+S对比手术:HR=0.81,95%可信区间=0.73-0.90;CRT+S对比CT+S:HR=0.82,95%可信区间=0.70-0.95;CRT+S对比RT+S:HR=0.77,95%可信区间=0.62-0.95)。对于无病生存期,CRT+S显示出优于CT+S的疗效(HR =0.70,95%可信区间=0.59-0.83)。总之,CRT+S在生存结局方面表现更佳,在所有治疗方法中排名最高。我们的研究结果可为医疗决策和治疗选择提供指导,这可能有助于临床医生提高食管癌治疗的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f660/5482659/dea8472ddd74/oncotarget-08-36339-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD006386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006386.pub4.
7
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Porphyromonas gingivalis infection exacerbates oesophageal cancer and promotes resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(3):433-444. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01419-5. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma with Upfront R0 Esophagectomy.
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Dec 18;12:13023-13032. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S286074. eCollection 2020.
5
Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 31;11:7243-7251. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S208320. eCollection 2019.
6
Combined modality treatment in mesothelioma: a systemic literature review with treatment recommendations.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;7(5):562-573. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.02.
7
Comparison of the prognosis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment with surgery alone in esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Jun 14;11:3441-3447. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S145063. eCollection 2018.
8
Prognostic role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 20;8(67):112085-112093. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22557. eCollection 2017 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

4
Cancer statistics, 2016.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
A Meta-Analysis of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0128616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128616. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验